2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00119-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary metastases: can accurate radiological evaluation avoid thoracotomic approach?

Abstract: The sensitivity of HCT exceeds that of HRCT. However, complete manual exploration by thoracotomy remains the procedure of choice for patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy, because of limitation in preoperative radiological assessment of lung lesions smaller than 6 mm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…CT scans of metastatic lung cancer frequently reveal single or multiple spherical nodules with a smooth periphery (5). In the present case, CT revealed the characteristic halo sign, a solid nodule surrounded by a ground-glass attenuation halo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CT scans of metastatic lung cancer frequently reveal single or multiple spherical nodules with a smooth periphery (5). In the present case, CT revealed the characteristic halo sign, a solid nodule surrounded by a ground-glass attenuation halo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Metastasis to the lungs is usually found through routine examinations, including lung CT and whole body PET. Patients with metastatic lung cancer present with primary tumor-related complications as the main clinical symptom and have no clear lung-related symptoms at an early stage (5). In the present case, hemoptysis that was reported as the only early clinical symptoms, and followed by vaginal bleeding are rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the rise of the fast high-resolution CT (HRCT), it is now possible to detect pulmonary nodules as small as 3 mm, which however results in a loss of sensitivity. Both conventional CT and HRCT have a sensitivity of 100% regarding nodules of 10 mm or higher (5). When the nodule size is smaller than 6 mm, the sensitivity of conventional CT drops to 63% and HRCT between 48-69% (5,6).…”
Section: Radiographic Diagnosis and Preoperative Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%