2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary metastasectomy – A retrospective comparison of surgical outcomes after laser-assisted and conventional resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Franzke et al in retrospective analysis, they compared resection with use of laser and conventional resection using other devices in 178 patients. There was no statistically significant survival difference between the two methods despite a significantly higher number of resected metastases in the laser group (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Franzke et al in retrospective analysis, they compared resection with use of laser and conventional resection using other devices in 178 patients. There was no statistically significant survival difference between the two methods despite a significantly higher number of resected metastases in the laser group (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recent series have suggested LAS with 1,320 nm Nd:YAG-lasers to be parenchyma-sparing, improve complete resection rates and thus provide beneficial results with longer survival rates especially in the case of resection of multiple pulmonary metastases (7,14). LAS provides a high precision tool for resection, causing only minimal damage and deformation of the surrounding lung tissue (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung metastases are often removed non-anatomically using a Nd:YAG laser [1,2], whereas pulmonary metastases are often removed via open access (thoracotomy). During open surgery the entire lung is carefully palpated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%