17 Preparation of high-quality sequencing libraries is a costly and time-consuming component of 18 metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS). While the overall cost of sequencing has 19 dropped significantly over recent years, the reagents needed to prepare sequencing samples are 20 likely to become the dominant expense in the process. Furthermore, libraries prepared by hand 21 are subject to human variability and needless waste due to limitations of manual pipetting 22 volumes. Reduction of reaction volumes, combined with sub-microliter automated dispensing of 23 reagents without consumable pipette tips, has the potential to provide significant advantages.24 Here, we describe the integration of several instruments, including the Labcyte Echo 525 25 acoustic liquid handler and the iSeq and NovaSeq Illumina sequencing platforms, to miniaturize 26 and automate mNGS library preparation, significantly reducing the cost and the time required to 27 prepare samples. Through the use of External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) spike-in 28 RNAs, we demonstrated the fidelity of the miniaturized preparation to be equivalent to full 29 volume reactions. Furthermore, detection of viral and microbial species from cell culture and 30 patient samples was also maintained in the miniaturized libraries. For 384-well mNGS library 31 preparations, we achieved a savings of over 80% in materials and reagents alone, and reduced 32 preparation time by 90% compared to manual approaches, without compromising quality or 33 representation within the library. 34 35 3 36 Introduction 37 Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is becoming an increasingly useful tool in the 38 field of biology and clinical medicine. Its applications are almost limitless -any nucleic acid 39 can be turned into a library, amplified, and sequenced, making mNGS an appealing technology 40 for labs and hospitals alike. As sequencers such as the Illumina NovaSeq increase throughput, 41 hundreds to thousands of libraries can be sequenced in a single run. Although the per-base cost 42 of sequencing has become less expensive over the last several decades, the cost and time 43 associated with sample preparation remain disproportionately high [1,2]. 44 45 Manual library preparation is tedious and is often the bottleneck for many sequencing projects. 46 Numerous library preparation protocols have been adapted for automation through the use of 47 various positive displacement tip-based liquid handler instruments, including the Beckman 48 Coulter Biomek, Hamilton Star, Agilent Technologies Bravo, TTP LabTech Mosquito, and 49 others [3-5]. Though these provide more hands-off time during the library preparation process, 50 the overall cost can often exceed that of hand-prepared libraries due to the increased dead 51 volume of reagents and the large number of expensive, sometimes proprietary tips required for 52 liquid handlers. Furthermore, sub-microliter miniaturization is a challenge for the majority of 53 positive displacement based liquid handlers. 54 55 Recently, ac...