2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73643-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary injury risk curves and behavioral changes from blast overpressure exposures of varying frequency and intensity in rats

Abstract: At present, there are no set guidelines establishing cumulative limits for blast exposure numbers and intensities in military personnel, in combat or training operations. The objective of the current study was to define lung injury, pathology, and associated behavioral changes from primary repeated blast lung injury under appropriate exposure conditions and combinations (i.e. blast overpressure (BOP) intensity and exposure frequency) using an advanced blast simulator. Male Sprague Dawley rats were exposed to B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these data indicate that repeated daily exposure to low-level BOP has significant effects on the brain in the short term, and these effects may contribute to long-term deficits reported by Warfighters. Importantly, the low intensities of BOP studied here do not cause gross lung injury (Sajja et al, 2020), so these effects are likely due to the direct effects of BOP on the brain rather than as the indirect result of systemic injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Together, these data indicate that repeated daily exposure to low-level BOP has significant effects on the brain in the short term, and these effects may contribute to long-term deficits reported by Warfighters. Importantly, the low intensities of BOP studied here do not cause gross lung injury (Sajja et al, 2020), so these effects are likely due to the direct effects of BOP on the brain rather than as the indirect result of systemic injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The pressure data was recorded at 800,000 samples/s that is baselined to ambient pressure with TMX 18 data recorder (Astronova, West Warwick, RI, USA). To avoid poly-organ injury in these experiments, acetate membranes (Grafix Inc., Ohio, OH, USA) were used to yield peak positive static pressures of 8.5 psig (positive pressure-impulse: 11.46 psig * ms, duration: 2.94 ms; negative pressure-impulse: −8.35 psig * ms, peak: −2.86 psig, duration: 5.89 ms) or 10 psig (positive pressure-impulse: 16.64 psig * ms, duration: 4.0 ms; negative pressure-impulse: −10.27 psig * ms, peak: −2.34 psig, duration: 7.07 ms) with a positive phase duration of 3-5 ms) as in Sajja et al (2020). Pressure profiles are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Bop Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, its effects on the body can last for long after exposure and involve interlinked mechanisms of systemic, local and cerebral responses. It has been well documented that BW exposure leads to air embolism ( Kirkman and Watts, 2011 ; van H. Mason et al, 1971 ), activation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) ( Cernak et al, 1996 ; Tümer et al, 2013 ), compromised blood flow throughout the body ( Health, 2014 ), blood brain barrier disruption ( Kuriakose et al, 2018 ), systemic inflammation ( Surbatovic et al, 2007 ; Cernak, 2010 ), along with damage to the lungs ( Elsayed and Gorbunov, 2007 ; Koliatsos et al, 2011 ; Sajja et al, 2020 ) and intestines ( Cripps and Cooper, 1997 ; Bala et al, 2008 ). As the BW propagates through the entire body and all the tissues, it triggers numerous biochemical and physiological changes, such as the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent damage to proteins ( Cho et al, 2013 ), damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released from necrotic cells, general tissue hypoxia due to compromised blood flow, and immunological changes both locally and systemically ( Thompson et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%