2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary embolism risk stratification by European Society of Cardiology is associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism: Findings from a long-term follow-up study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to two previous studies [ 33 , 34 ], our study is the first to show an association between the CTOI and VTE recurrence. Den Exter et al focused on the association between thromboembolic resolution assessed by CTPA and VTE recurrence, mentioning that the CTOI was not associated with recurrent VTE (no data shown) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast to two previous studies [ 33 , 34 ], our study is the first to show an association between the CTOI and VTE recurrence. Den Exter et al focused on the association between thromboembolic resolution assessed by CTPA and VTE recurrence, mentioning that the CTOI was not associated with recurrent VTE (no data shown) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…There are different results as to whether the clot burden score is a definite factor for risk classification. Both Shen et al ( 22 ) and Zhang et al ( 23 ) showed that the clot burden score was significantly related to the high-risk group and was a determinant for this risk group in their studies. In our study, the mean clot burden score belonging to the high-risk group was lower, though its results broadly correlated to results of previous studies in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The simplified PESI After a diagnosis is made, high prognostic risk patients are identifiable by signs of shock and respiratory failure, but intermediate and low-risk patients are difficult to differentiate. 44 The three most sensitive CPS are the PESI, sPESI and ESC guideline risk stratification criteria, with sensitivities of 0.89, 0.92 and 0.88, respectively, with the sPESI (Table 1) as the most validated. 5,45,46 A sPESI score = 0 ('low risk') has a reported 30-day mortality rate of 1.0-1.5%, while a score ≥1 ('high risk') is 10.7-10.9%, but can be over 20% in haemodynamically unstable patients.…”
Section: Intermediate and High-risk Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sPESI ≥1 indicates a need for admission, while a sPESI = 0 should prompt consideration of early discharge and outpatient management. 44,[52][53][54][55][56] The sPESI is a useful tool in decision-making, but it should not be the only factor considered when making early management choices.…”
Section: Intermediate and High-risk Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%