Small Animal Critical Care Medicine 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-0306-7.00202-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pulmonary Artery Catheterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in CVP, RAP, PAP and PCWP have traditionally been used to assess cardiac preload in dogs [ 3 , 16 , 25 ]. Their normal values range from 0 to 5 cmH 2 O for CVP [ 16 ], from 2 to 5 mmHg for RAP [ 25 ], from 8 to 20 mmHg for PAP [ 25 ] and from 5 to 12 mmHg for PCWP [ 25 ] in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in CVP, RAP, PAP and PCWP have traditionally been used to assess cardiac preload in dogs [ 3 , 16 , 25 ]. Their normal values range from 0 to 5 cmH 2 O for CVP [ 16 ], from 2 to 5 mmHg for RAP [ 25 ], from 8 to 20 mmHg for PAP [ 25 ] and from 5 to 12 mmHg for PCWP [ 25 ] in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in CVP, RAP, PAP and PCWP have traditionally been used to assess cardiac preload in dogs [ 3 , 16 , 25 ]. Their normal values range from 0 to 5 cmH 2 O for CVP [ 16 ], from 2 to 5 mmHg for RAP [ 25 ], from 8 to 20 mmHg for PAP [ 25 ] and from 5 to 12 mmHg for PCWP [ 25 ] in dogs. The CVP, RAP, PAP and PCWP pressure values increased linearly and significantly in all dogs (both fluid responders and non-responders) at all stages of fluid loading from euvolemic, making it impossible to differentiate fluid responders and non-responders in these pressure parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%