2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pullout testing and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) analysis of geogrid reinforcement embedded in granular drainage layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the friction property of the interface of the two materials. These conclusions are similar to those found in the literature [23].…”
Section: Frictional Behavior Of the Contact Interfacesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the friction property of the interface of the two materials. These conclusions are similar to those found in the literature [23].…”
Section: Frictional Behavior Of the Contact Interfacesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Esmaeili and Pourrashnoo [22] investigated the effect of encasement of ballast with geogrid on shear behavior using a large-scale direct shear apparatus. Mirzaeifar et al [23] studied the possibility of using finegrained soil as backfill material of geosynthetic-reinforced walls and slopes through a laboratory study on pullout behavior of geogrids in granular layers. Moreover, with the help of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), the soil-geogrid interactions at different gravimetric water contents (GWC) values were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the values of the dimensionless model coefficient, along with other analytical parameters assessed in this study. The results of the nonlinear fitting between the normalized pullout force (Pn) and the normalized head displacement (δn) are presented in Table 4, following the calculation procedures based on Equation (4). By restricting the range to 0 < δn ≤ 1, a strong statistical agreement (R 2 > 0.90) with the experimental data was achieved.…”
Section: Load-displacement Behaviormentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls utilize the tensile capabilities of inclusions to create reinforced soil masses, and their geomechanical performance is influenced by fill quality and reinforcement characteristics, with coarse-grained aggregates being preferred over fine-grained soils [1][2][3][4][5]. This has limited the use of some alternative fill materials in MSE walls, such as fine-grained tropical soils and industrial byproducts [6], which often do not achieve the conventional design criteria [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%