2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pull-off adhesion prediction of variable thick overlay to the substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach resulted in increased joint strength and was demonstrated to be applicable in both coating and bonding with PLA films without a significant reduction of the mechanical properties of the joints. However, it is necessary to keep in mind that the final results of the bonding and mechanical performance of bondlines are governed by a wide range of parameters such as substrate surface chemistry and microstructure, process parameters, and experimental conditions [46][47][48].…”
Section: Effect Of Plasma Treatment On the Performance Of Adhesive Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach resulted in increased joint strength and was demonstrated to be applicable in both coating and bonding with PLA films without a significant reduction of the mechanical properties of the joints. However, it is necessary to keep in mind that the final results of the bonding and mechanical performance of bondlines are governed by a wide range of parameters such as substrate surface chemistry and microstructure, process parameters, and experimental conditions [46][47][48].…”
Section: Effect Of Plasma Treatment On the Performance Of Adhesive Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyse, compare, and optimise new products, different approaches have been used [40,41], with one of these approaches being related to the use of multivariate statistical techniques [42][43][44][45]. These techniques have also been used to study cement-based products [46,47], allowing for the simplification of the interpretation of their performance, with particular emphasis on cluster analysis and Principal Components Analysis (PCA) [43,44,48,49]. This approach allows us to reduce data dimension, visualise results, and identify possible correlations that would otherwise not be found [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. As alvenarias de blocos cerâmicos [14-16, 35, 36, 38, 39, 42, 43, 48, 50, 54-57, 61-63, 66, 69, 70, 74, 75, 77, 80, 90, 97, 105-108, 110] e os corpos de prova individuais sobre blocos cerâmicos [18-29, 34, 40, 51, 52, 60, 65, 71, 73, 78, 79, 93, 98, 101, 109] foram os substratos mais empregados nas pesquisas encontradas, seguidos de estruturas de concreto [12,13,17,40,41,45,49,58,62,63,67,76,78,82,94,106,110], alvenarias de blocos de concreto [14, 30, 37, 44, 46, 47, 55, 59, 62-64, 81, 89, 106-108], substratos-padrão [64,83,85,86,92,95,102,112], blocos individuais de concreto [17,40,53,78,84,88,109], alvenaria de/ou blocos de concreto celular autoclavado [14,40], alvenaria de/ou blocos sílicocalcário [14,40] e granito [91].…”
Section: Resultsunclassified