2017
DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pull-in criteria of a nonclassical microbeam under electric field using homotopy method

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, a homotopy analysis method was used to obtain analytic solutions to predict dynamic pull-in instability of an electrostatically-actuated microbeam. The nonlinear describing equation of a microbeam a ected by an electric eld, including the fringing eld e ect, was obtained based on strain gradient elasticity, couple stress, and classical theory. In uences of di erent parameters on dynamic pull-in instability were investigated. The equation of motion of a double-clamped microbeam was disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second and third authors have the same contribution. advanced technologies such as precision metrology, scanning probe microscopy [1]- [7], energy harvesting [8] [9] [10] [11], medical robotics [12] [13], biomechanics research apparatus [14]- [20], orthodontics [21] [22] [23], material [24] [25] [26], structural engineering [27] [28], microfluidic devices [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] and other instruments which need precise actuation. Several different factors limit the precision positioning of PPNP stages, including mechanical vibrations, external disturbances, hysteresis and creep effects, temperature variation, and the cross-coupling of the different axes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second and third authors have the same contribution. advanced technologies such as precision metrology, scanning probe microscopy [1]- [7], energy harvesting [8] [9] [10] [11], medical robotics [12] [13], biomechanics research apparatus [14]- [20], orthodontics [21] [22] [23], material [24] [25] [26], structural engineering [27] [28], microfluidic devices [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] and other instruments which need precise actuation. Several different factors limit the precision positioning of PPNP stages, including mechanical vibrations, external disturbances, hysteresis and creep effects, temperature variation, and the cross-coupling of the different axes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%