2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgi.2004.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publishing trends within state government: The situation in North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For those states that employ a selective collection approach, selection decisions in Web publication preservation projects are complicated by a number of factors. Real preservation challenges stem from the short life of government information (California Digital Library, 2003) and the lack of agency efforts to restoring and retaining retrospective information (Martin, 2004). Research shows that agency webmasters are usually more concerned with providing current and updated information and enhancing the user experiences by improving the "looks" and the functionalities of the Web sites rather than providing long-term access to superceded or noncurrent publications (Martin, 2004); a Web document may be removed as long as the agency considers it has served its current missions without thought to its continued value to the public.…”
Section: The Challenges In Selection Web Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For those states that employ a selective collection approach, selection decisions in Web publication preservation projects are complicated by a number of factors. Real preservation challenges stem from the short life of government information (California Digital Library, 2003) and the lack of agency efforts to restoring and retaining retrospective information (Martin, 2004). Research shows that agency webmasters are usually more concerned with providing current and updated information and enhancing the user experiences by improving the "looks" and the functionalities of the Web sites rather than providing long-term access to superceded or noncurrent publications (Martin, 2004); a Web document may be removed as long as the agency considers it has served its current missions without thought to its continued value to the public.…”
Section: The Challenges In Selection Web Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggested that the average length of existence of a Web document in government agency sites is four months (Cho & Garcia-Molina, 2000). Further, many agencies do not have plans to retain and restore the removed born-digital information resources (Martin, 2004), and many states do not legally mandate such retention efforts by the agencies (Matthews, et al, 2003). If the state libraries fail to capture a Web publication in time, it may be lost forever.…”
Section: The Challenges In Selection Web Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis also revealed that agencies frequently pull content from their site. Of 333 digital serials available through the Web in 2003, only 165 titles had back issues available online (Martin 2004). As new information supersedes older information, state agencies both replace the information on the Web and discard the 'offline' content.…”
Section: Volatile Nature Of Information On the Webmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a survey completed in 2003 confirmed that approximately half of all state publications were produced in digital format only, and a third of state agencies predicted that more than ninety percent of their publications would be born-digital within 5 years (Martin 2004 publications shifting to digital formats, but new presentation options available through the World Wide Web had blurred the traditional distinctions between publications and records. With the exception of Intranet pages, websites are publicly available and thus may be considered published.…”
Section: Early Efforts In North Carolinamentioning
confidence: 99%