This comparative case study examined the capture and selection practices used to populate electronic depositories of born-digital state government publications. The three case sites illustrate differences in collection building approaches, technological infrastructures, and statutory contexts. The findings reveal two basic modes of selection practices-active selection and passive selection, and three selection models based on the loci of selection control-library selection, liaison selection, and creator selection. Also, the findings suggest the power of defining and selecting government publications for state depositories is shifting from government agencies to state libraries in the active selection. The authors argue for the needs to attend to Web publications in non-traditional formats (e.g. an interactive HTML document) and to include common publications produced for lay citizens (e.g. brochures, fact sheets, FAQs, etc.) in the permanent collections in order to fully document the government activities for the historical record of a society.
IntroductionOver the last decade, there has been a significant shift in the United States government publishing from print publications to Web-based information. Encouraged by several legislative and administrative initiatives (Government Printing Office, 1996), governments at the federal and state levels are now publishing and disseminating massive amount of information predominantly via the Web. In 2003, nearly two-thirds of the information resources made available via the Federal Depository Library Program (FLDP) were "born digital" (California Digital Library, 2003). At the state level, a recent study estimated that 43% to 60% of the North Carolina state publications were published in digital format only (Martin, 2004), and the Arizona state agency Web sites contain more than 300,000 electronic documents at any given time (Pearce-Moses & Kaczmarek, 2005).For government agencies, Web publishing has several advantages over printing. It is considered a costeffective means of information dissemination, especially in times of budget cuts (Mullen, 2001;Martin, 2004); Web content is easy to maintain and update (Martin, 2004), and it potentially provides improved access (Mullen, 2001), enhances government-citizen interaction experiences (Clayton & Gregory, 2003;Reddick, 2005), and encourages civic participation (Larson & Rainie, 2002;Horrigan, 2004). For depository library programs, however, the shift from print to Web publications requires dramatic rearrangement of work processes. Many state libraries have initiated projects to collect and preserve Web-based government information. Several competitive models have emerged (Matthews, et al, 2003; California Digital Library, 2003;Pearce-Moses & Kaczmarek, 2005). This study systematically examined the collection development policies, statutory frameworks, and work arrangements for capturing and selecting Web-based state publications within three states-Connecticut, New Mexico, and Texas. It identified the advantages and challen...