Publishing Patterns in Specialist Accounting History Journals in the English Language, 1996–1999

Carnegie, Garry D.; Potter, Brad

doi:10.2308/0148-4184.27.2.177

Cited by 83 publications

(150 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

137

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, in a recent study, Carnegie and Potter (2000) examined all papers published in specialist accounting history journals in the English language (i.e., Accounting, Business and Financial History; The Accounting Historians Journal; and Accounting History) during the period 1996-1999. Their results revealed that 84.78% of all papers included in their database (149) were authored by scholars affiliated to Anglo-Saxon institutions, whereas France lead the non-Anglo-Saxon counterparts by sharing 8.05% of total contributions.…”

Section: Everybody Knows That …mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context

Carmona¹

2004

Accounting History

118

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract______________________________________________________________________Drawing on extensive evidence gathered from all accounting history papers published in major research journals during the 1990s, it is argued that extant patterns of dissemination of accounting history research in international contexts are less than efficient, which in turn results in a glaring neglect of the 'majority' in 'international' journals in the English language. My understanding of the term majority refers to the subjects who conduct research (i.e., men and women affiliated to non-Anglo-Saxon institutions), the research settings (i.e., non-Anglo-Saxon environments), and the observation periods (i.e., those different from . At best, some of historiographies have a superficial visibility in the international arena, whereas most of them are fully neglected. I shall argue that accounting history research would gain in strength if other scholars, settings, and periods of study were added to those regularly reflected in 'international' journals. I contend that such broadening of the discipline represents the most important challenge for accounting historians in the years to come.

show abstract

Section: Everybody Knows That …mentioning

confidence: 99%

Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context

Carmona¹

2004

Accounting History

118

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research into gender diversity and internationalisation of accounting boards has attracted limited attention (exceptions Carnegie et al, 2003 andJones 2008). This contrasts with research into management journal boards, for example, where board characteristics have been extensively examined (Svensson, Slatten and Tronveil 2007;Ozbilgin 2004;Harzing 2009, 2012;Murphy and Zhu 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalisation

Dhanani¹,

Jones²

2017

AAAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms 1 Editorial Boards of Accounting Journals: Gender Diversity and Internationalisation Abstract Purpose: Editorial boards of academic journals represent a key institutional mechanism in the governance and functioning of the academic community. Board members play an important role in knowledge production and development of the discipline. This study examines the diversity characteristics of boards of accounting journals.Design: Drawing on a diversity framework that distinguishes between societal diversity and value of diversity, the paper examines two board characteristics: gender diversity and internationalisation. Moreover, it examines the influence of three journal and two editor characteristics on board diversity and analyses trends over time.Findings: On gender, overall board trends appear to reflect both societal diversity and value of diversity: boards reflect the gender profile of senior academics. Further, female board representation has improved over time, is consistent across different countries, and 'gendered' sub-disciplines attract a relatively higher female board representation. However, inequities persist at the highest level: women are under-represented as editors and on boards of higher ranked journals. On internationalisation, once again overall trends broadly reflect societal diversity and value at diversity. However, boards of UK and Australian and 2* and 3* journals are significantly more international than their US and 4* counterparts, respectively. Further, the representation of international scholars has witnessed a modest rise over time. Finally, editor gender and change in editor play an intervening role in the gender and international characteristics of boards, respectively.Originality: Drawing on the diversity framework, this study is the first to comprehensively examine gender diversity and internationalisation of accounting boards.

show abstract

“…Moreover I have also considered some relevant papers and articles such as the ones by Garry D. Carnegie and B. N. Potter (2000), Garry D. Carnegie and C. J. Napier (2002), Salvador Carmona (2003), Richard K. Fleischman and Vaughan S. Radcliffe (2005) as well as the subsequent discussion carried on it by Garry D. Carnegie (2006) and Vaughan S. Radcliffe (2006), and finally the paper by Stephen P. Walker (2005).…”

Section: Introduction: Scope Methodology Sources and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Some reflections on the orientations and volume of accounting history research in the 21st century

Esteve¹

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo toma como punto de partida el 8 th World Congress of Accounting Historians e intenta identificar las orientaciones que la investigación en historia de la contabilidad ha seguido desde entonces, es decir, desde el año 2000 hasta el 2007, los primeros años del siglo XX. El principal propósito de este ensayo es averiguar si ha habido novedades significativas en las direcciones de la investigación o, si por el contrario, su desarrollo ha seguido el curso previsible. Trataremos de asociar este propósito al estudio del volumen de la investigación publicada a este respecto en las principales revistas de contabilidad. Después de haber examinado y descrito la evolución de la historia de la contabilidad en estos primeros años del presente siglo, presentaremos algunas consideraciones personales acerca de los derroteros en que la investigación podría moverse en el próximo futuro.Para cumplir este propósito, he tomado en consideración los artículos más importantes sobre el estado de la cuestión publicados en el período en cuestión y, sobre todo, he examinado cuidadosamente los artículos publicados en las revistas doctrinales dedicadas de forma específica o preferente a la historia de la contabilidad, es decir, Accounting Historians Journal, Accounting, Business and Financial History, Accounting History, Contabilità e Cultura Aziendale y De Computis. Con el mismo fin, he revisado las revistas de contabilidad más relevantes. Entre todas ellas, las que han mostrado más interés por la historia de la contabilidad, ordenadas según el número de artículos publicados sobre esta materia, han sido las siguientes: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, European Accounting Review, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, Abacus, Revista de Contabilidad, Accounting and Business Research, y Accounting Forum. Aparte de en éstas, hemos encontrado artículos sobre historia de la contabilidad en unas cincuenta revistas más entre todas las examinadas. En total, he encontrado artículos sobre nuestra disciplina en 62 revistas. Los artículos publicados en estas revistas tomados en consideración se elevan a un total de 683.Aunque a menudo suponen la investigación más reciente y avanzada, no hemos tenido en cuenta los trabajos no publicados presentados en los principales congresos y encuentros sobre historia de la contabilidad. En muchos casos, no se trata de artículos completamente terminados, sino en proceso de elaboración. En otros casos, se presentan varias versiones de ellos, recogiendo correcciones y mejoras, en congresos sucesivos. Por consiguiente, su toma en consideración hubiera ampliado artificialmente el volumen de la investigación realizada. Por otra parte, la mayoría de los más revelantes se acaba publicando.

show abstract

Publishing Patterns in Specialist Accounting History Journals in the English Language, 1996–1999

Cited by 83 publications

References 11 publications

Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context

Accounting history research and its diffusion in an international context

Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalisation

Some reflections on the orientations and volume of accounting history research in the 21st century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About