2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.209904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher’s Note: Proposal of a Two-Qutrit Contextuality Test Free of the Finite Precision and Compatibility Loopholes [Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 190401 (2011)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the reasonings above we have taken into account of condition 2 which demands that linked rays not be assigned simultaneously to value 1 and in a triangle one and only one ray be assigned to value 1. A set of eight rays in each case considered above, e.g., ĥ0,1 , z 2,3 , and y ± 2,3 , constitutes in fact a 3-box paradox [23] which appears also in Cliffton's state-dependent proof of KS theorem [24] and a recent proposal to close the compatibility loopholes [25].…”
Section: +1 +2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the reasonings above we have taken into account of condition 2 which demands that linked rays not be assigned simultaneously to value 1 and in a triangle one and only one ray be assigned to value 1. A set of eight rays in each case considered above, e.g., ĥ0,1 , z 2,3 , and y ± 2,3 , constitutes in fact a 3-box paradox [23] which appears also in Cliffton's state-dependent proof of KS theorem [24] and a recent proposal to close the compatibility loopholes [25].…”
Section: +1 +2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A debate still continues about whether finite precision and compatibility loopholes negate experimental tests of the K-S theorem and demonstrations of contextuality [31]. It is possible that newer proofs of the K-S theorem [32] could suggest experiments that plug these loopholes and also find application in such protocols as quantum key distribution [26], random number generation [27] and parity oblivious transfer [28].…”
Section: Relation To Ongoing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question of the connection between contextuality and nonlocality. It is known that it is possible to convert some contextuality proofs based on KS sets into Bell inequalities [17][18][19][20]. However, so far only one of them has a violation large enough to allow experimental verification with entangled ququarts [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%