2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.71.019901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher's Note: Measurement of the final statesωπ0,pη, andpηfrom

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, there are also a number of interesting phenomenological observations to be made. First, there are similar near threshold excesses which have already been observed in light vector mesons through radiative J/ψ or exclusive B decays: the near threshold enhancements for two isospin-0 vectors φφ, ωω, and ωφ; [93][94][95][96][97][98][99] and the near threshold enhancement for two isospin-1 vectors ρρ. 100,101 However, there has been no clear structure observed that decays into two vectors that one of them has isospin-1 and the other has isospin-0-φρ or ωρ.…”
Section: Possible Interpretations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Finally, there are also a number of interesting phenomenological observations to be made. First, there are similar near threshold excesses which have already been observed in light vector mesons through radiative J/ψ or exclusive B decays: the near threshold enhancements for two isospin-0 vectors φφ, ωω, and ωφ; [93][94][95][96][97][98][99] and the near threshold enhancement for two isospin-1 vectors ρρ. 100,101 However, there has been no clear structure observed that decays into two vectors that one of them has isospin-1 and the other has isospin-0-φρ or ωρ.…”
Section: Possible Interpretations and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For the e + e − → V P with V and P being a vector and pseudoscalar meson, respectively, the differential cross section scales as [20] are consistent with the above scaling in Eq. (4) (see also results from BES [21] and BaBar [22]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The existence of η(1760) therefore rests on (a) the BES I analysis [8], where M = 1760 ± 35 MeV, Γ ∼ 250 MeV, (but quoted as not well determined), (b) the BES II analysis of J/ψ → γ(ωω), M = 1744 ± 10(stat) ± 15(syst) MeV, Γ = 244 +24 −21 ± 25 MeV [9]. There is a serious objection to this second source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%