2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.089901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher’s Note: Interfacial Structure Dependent Spin Mixing Conductance in Cobalt Thin Films [Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 056601 (2015)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering bulk value as reference layer, we evaluated effective spin mixing conductance ~ 2.00 ± 0.08 × 10 18 m -2 for Pt/Co/Pt layer which is larger than Ta/Pt/Co/Pt/Ta. These values are in agreement with other reports [21]. It is also observed that the g-factor decreases with increasing effective demagnetization field with respect to seed and capping layers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By considering bulk value as reference layer, we evaluated effective spin mixing conductance ~ 2.00 ± 0.08 × 10 18 m -2 for Pt/Co/Pt layer which is larger than Ta/Pt/Co/Pt/Ta. These values are in agreement with other reports [21]. It is also observed that the g-factor decreases with increasing effective demagnetization field with respect to seed and capping layers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is known that g ↑↓ describes the total spin current and it gets dissipated from the FM film through its interface with NM layer by considering the backflow of the spin current. The estimated values of g ↑↓ are comparable to the other recent reported values [21]. It can be seen from Table IV that the value of g ↑↓ is highest (2.00 ± 0.08 × 10 18 m -2 ) for sample S7 in which Pt is used as both seed and capping layers.…”
Section: Sample Sample Details (In Parenthesis Thickness Is In Nm)supporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20 This unambiguously isolates any interfacial contribution to AMR from effects due to variations in the film microstructure and/or texture between pairs of samples with different overlayers. Microstructural variation in the cobalt layers would occur were we to use Ir/Co/Ir multilayers; due to the lattice mismatch between Ir and Co, Co grown on Ir will have a very different density of crystalline defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%