2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.199902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher’s Note: Indications of Proton-Dominated Cosmic-Ray Composition above 1.6 EeV [Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 161101 (2010)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the data from Yakutsk and Tunka one obtains lnA xg ≃ 2.6 to 1.4, so that the average extragalactic CR mass ranges from that of N (for Sibyll) to that of He (for QGSJet). This is in tension with measurements in the EeV range by Auger [22] and HiRes [40] that find that for the energies 0.3 to 1 EeV the average composition should not be heavier than He. Considering Auger composition data one infers that lnA xg ≃ 1.3 to 0, consistent with an average mass between that of He (for Sibyll) and H (for QGSJet).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the data from Yakutsk and Tunka one obtains lnA xg ≃ 2.6 to 1.4, so that the average extragalactic CR mass ranges from that of N (for Sibyll) to that of He (for QGSJet). This is in tension with measurements in the EeV range by Auger [22] and HiRes [40] that find that for the energies 0.3 to 1 EeV the average composition should not be heavier than He. Considering Auger composition data one infers that lnA xg ≃ 1.3 to 0, consistent with an average mass between that of He (for Sibyll) and H (for QGSJet).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The Galactic CRs include almost all known nuclear elements, with a composition having some similarities with the abundances found in the solar system although they also present some clear differences (such as the abundances of the spallation products mentioned before or those that may be associated to the contributions to the CR fluxes coming from different types of supernovae, etc.). The most abundant elements are H, 4 He, light nuclei such as 12 C, 14 N and 16 O, intermediate mass nuclei such as 20 Ne, 24 Mg, 28 Si or 32 S or heavier nuclei such as 36 Ar, 40 Ca and specially 56 Fe. We will hence adopt for simplicity five representative mass components, A = H, He, N, Si and Fe, to describe the Galactic CR fluxes.…”
Section: Spectrum Of the Galactic And Extragalactic Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows the UHECR proton flux from ϕ 7 and ϕ 8 for zero evolution, as often assumed for BL Lacs, or cosmic star formation rate [76][77][78] evolution. These fall below the data [79][80][81][82], though ϕ 8 is close at > ∼ 10 18 eV where the composition is light [83][84][85]. Fewer pions per neutron would raise the flux [48], though saturation would leave no room for UHECR mechanisms besides neutron escape from IceCube sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This suggests that the UHECR composition transitions from being dominated by protons below the ankle to being dominated by heavier nuclei with average masses similar to Si or Fe at ∼5 × 10 19 eV (see also Glushkov et al 2008). We caution, however, that HiRes has not verified this finding (Abbasi et al 2005(Abbasi et al , 2010. 2 The UHECR composition measured by Auger is puzzling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%