2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.079902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher’s Note: Hadronic contribution to the muong2factor: A theoretical determination [Phys. Rev. D85, 014029 (2012)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the c-quark contribution a result of 14.4(1)×10 −10 is given by [36], with which our result is in good agreement. For the s-quark contribution, we can make predictions based on the data compilation from [3] for energies up to 2 GeV in the dispersion integral and by using perturbative QCD for higher energies.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For the c-quark contribution a result of 14.4(1)×10 −10 is given by [36], with which our result is in good agreement. For the s-quark contribution, we can make predictions based on the data compilation from [3] for energies up to 2 GeV in the dispersion integral and by using perturbative QCD for higher energies.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Recently it was proposed to extract the photon vacuum polarization in the spacelike region from Bhabha and µe scattering data [8,9], which would allow for a direct comparison with lattice results. Other approaches that combine phenomenological constraints with information from lattice QCD employ expansions of a hvp µ in terms of Mellin-Barnes moments [10][11][12] or finite energy sum rules [13,14]. The hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution has so far only been determined via model estimates (as reviewed in [5,[15][16][17]), although efforts have been undertaken to move towards a data-driven [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] approach as well.…”
Section: Jhep10(2017)020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this we should add an additional systematic error of 1% for missing v 4 terms in the NRQCD vector current, giving 0.762 (51 …”
Section: B υ Leptonic Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%