2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.029907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher's Note: Erratum: Electron rescattering in strong-field photodetachment ofF[Phys. Rev. A91, 031404(R) (2015)] [Phys. Rev. A93, 069901 (2016)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For λ = 1300 nm the KTA results are very close to those of RMT model 1, while for λ = 1800 nm the KTA detachment probabilities fall between those of models 1 and 2. This is a much better agreement than in the original paper [5], which reported incorrect KTA numbers [6].…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For λ = 1300 nm the KTA results are very close to those of RMT model 1, while for λ = 1800 nm the KTA detachment probabilities fall between those of models 1 and 2. This is a much better agreement than in the original paper [5], which reported incorrect KTA numbers [6].…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Since m = 0 electron states give a dominant contribution to the detachment signal, this error affected the interference patterns of the photoelectron momentum and energy distributions presented in Ref. [1] (see [5] and erratum [6]). In addition, we have found that the magnitudes of the photoelectron angular and energy spectra in Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial momenta are computed by solving Eqs. (22) and (23), with the tunnel exit as an initial position and the final momenta as a final "limit" condition. In order to implement the limit on the momenta we solve the problem iteratively, starting from the SFA and increasing the influence of the Coulomb potential.…”
Section: B Coulomb Quantum-orbit Strong-field Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should also note that, in strong-field photodetachment of negative ions, i.e. for short-range binding potentials, there is a very good agreement between the SFA and the full solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) [22][23][24] and experimental results [25], with approximately vertical fringes instead of a fan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%