2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.149903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publisher's Note: Algorithms for entanglement renormalization [Phys. Rev. B79, 144108 (2009)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
206
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of tensor network states for one-dimensional systems include the matrix product state [1][2][3] (MPS), which results naturally from both Wilson's numerical renormalization group 4 and White's density-matrix renormalization group [5][6][7][8] (DMRG) and is also used as a basis for simulation of time evolution, e.g., with the time evolving block decimation (TEBD) [9][10][11] algorithm and variations thereof, often collectively referred to as time-dependent DMRG; 9-14 the tree tensor network 15 (TTN), which follows from coarsegraining schemes where the spins are blocked hierarchically; and the multiscale entanglement renormalization Ansatz [16][17][18][19][20][21] (MERA), which results from a renormalization-group procedure known as entanglement renormalization. 16,21 For twodimensional (2D) lattices there are generalizations of these three tensor network states, namely projected entangled pair states [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] (PEPS), 2D TTN, 32,33 and 2D MERA, [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of tensor network states for one-dimensional systems include the matrix product state [1][2][3] (MPS), which results naturally from both Wilson's numerical renormalization group 4 and White's density-matrix renormalization group [5][6][7][8] (DMRG) and is also used as a basis for simulation of time evolution, e.g., with the time evolving block decimation (TEBD) [9][10][11] algorithm and variations thereof, often collectively referred to as time-dependent DMRG; 9-14 the tree tensor network 15 (TTN), which follows from coarsegraining schemes where the spins are blocked hierarchically; and the multiscale entanglement renormalization Ansatz [16][17][18][19][20][21] (MERA), which results from a renormalization-group procedure known as entanglement renormalization. 16,21 For twodimensional (2D) lattices there are generalizations of these three tensor network states, namely projected entangled pair states [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] (PEPS), 2D TTN, 32,33 and 2D MERA, [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization algorithms to approximate ground states, and to evaluate local expectation values and correlators, are present in the literature. 11,15 The numerical cost of finding an expectation value or performing a single optimization iteration using the binary MERA scales as O(χ 9 ln L) for a translation-invariant system. For more complex MERA structures, such as those representing two-dimensional (2D) lattices, the power of χ for the cost increases dramatically.…”
Section: A Mera Expectation Values and Causal Conesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8(b). Here, we have used MERA wave functions previously optimized using standard techniques 11 without Monte Carlo sampling, that is, sampling is only employed to extract the expectation values.…”
Section: A Expectation Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations