1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02221298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review

Abstract: Published reports from seven jointly developed experiments have addressed whether or not arrest is an effective deterrent to misdemeanor spouse assault. Findings supporting a deterrent effect, no effect, and an escalation effect have been reported by the original authors and in interpretations of the published findings by other authors. This review found many methodologically defensible approaches used in these reports but not one of these approaches was used consistently in all published reports. Tables repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
79
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of this body of research has focused on the police response, particularly the impact of arrest on future violence (Berk, Campbell, Klap, & Western, 1992;Dunford, Huizinga, & Elliot, 1990;Garner, Fagan, & Maxwell 1995; Hirshel & Hutchison, 2003;Sherman & Berk, 1984). Research on the impact of arrest on future violence has often been criticized, however, for taking arrest out of the context of the larger criminal legal system (e.g., Grant Bowman, 1992;Lerman, 1992).…”
Section: A R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much of this body of research has focused on the police response, particularly the impact of arrest on future violence (Berk, Campbell, Klap, & Western, 1992;Dunford, Huizinga, & Elliot, 1990;Garner, Fagan, & Maxwell 1995; Hirshel & Hutchison, 2003;Sherman & Berk, 1984). Research on the impact of arrest on future violence has often been criticized, however, for taking arrest out of the context of the larger criminal legal system (e.g., Grant Bowman, 1992;Lerman, 1992).…”
Section: A R T I C L Ementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The problem this raises is that such heightened surveillance in not possible under ordinary probation circumstances. Garner, Fagan and Maxwell (1995) and Garner and Maxwell (2000) pooled data across all six replication sites to standardize the methodologies and measures. Using victim interviews (the more sensitive measure) as outcome measures, this re-analysis found that independent of site, length of time between initial and follow-up interviews, and suspect characteristics, offenders in the arrested group were significantly less likely to repeat their "aggression" (subsequent assaults, verbal threats of assault, and property damage) than those in the non-arrest group.…”
Section: Belief Perseverancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sherman's (1992) post hoc explanation ("stakes in conformity") draws attention to the variable effects of arrest on different types of people in different types of neighborhoods. Others focused on the methodological strengths and weaknesses both within and across study sites and specific sets of analyses (Fagan and Browne, 1994;Garner et aL, 1995). Nevertheless, given the dramatic change informal policy following the Minneapolis proarrest findings (see Garner et al, 1995, p. 4), these replications in different sites proved to be critical.…”
Section: Theoretical Developments On Gender and Crime Victimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%