Abstract:Conclusion: This study provides the first national evaluation of a significant proportion of women choosing publicly funded homebirth in Australia; however, the sample size does not have sufficient power to draw a conclusion about safety. More research is warranted into the safety of alternative places of birth within Australia.
“…These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013). While the efficacy of such programs is beyond the scope of this article, the research on these programs offers compelling evidence of their success (Catling et al, 2014;Catling-Paull et al, 2012;McMurtrie et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs are government funded, and have strict eligibility guidelines (see Catling-Paull, Foureur, & Homer, 2012), which the pregnant/birthing woman must comply with or her participation in the program will be cancelled. These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013).…”
The "home versus hospital" as places of birth debate has had a long and at times vicious history. From academic literature to media coverage, the two have often been pitted against each other not only as opposing physical spaces, but also as opposing ideologies of birth. The hospital has been heavily critiqued as a site of childbirth since the 1960s, with particular focus on childbirth and medicalisation. The focus of much of the hospital and home birthing research exists on a continuum of medicalisation, safety, risk, agency, and maternal and neonatal health and wellbeing. While the hospital birthing space has been interrogated, a critique of home birthing space has remained largely absent from the social sciences. The research presented in this article unpacks the complex relationship between home birthing women and the spaces in which they birth. Using qualitative data collected with 59 home birthing women in Australia in 2010, between childbearing and the home should not be considered as merely an alternative to hospital births, but rather as an experience that completely renegotiates the home space. Home, for the participants in this study, is a dynamic, changing, and even spiritual element in the childbirth experience, and not simply the building in which it occurs.
“…These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013). While the efficacy of such programs is beyond the scope of this article, the research on these programs offers compelling evidence of their success (Catling et al, 2014;Catling-Paull et al, 2012;McMurtrie et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs are government funded, and have strict eligibility guidelines (see Catling-Paull, Foureur, & Homer, 2012), which the pregnant/birthing woman must comply with or her participation in the program will be cancelled. These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013).…”
The "home versus hospital" as places of birth debate has had a long and at times vicious history. From academic literature to media coverage, the two have often been pitted against each other not only as opposing physical spaces, but also as opposing ideologies of birth. The hospital has been heavily critiqued as a site of childbirth since the 1960s, with particular focus on childbirth and medicalisation. The focus of much of the hospital and home birthing research exists on a continuum of medicalisation, safety, risk, agency, and maternal and neonatal health and wellbeing. While the hospital birthing space has been interrogated, a critique of home birthing space has remained largely absent from the social sciences. The research presented in this article unpacks the complex relationship between home birthing women and the spaces in which they birth. Using qualitative data collected with 59 home birthing women in Australia in 2010, between childbearing and the home should not be considered as merely an alternative to hospital births, but rather as an experience that completely renegotiates the home space. Home, for the participants in this study, is a dynamic, changing, and even spiritual element in the childbirth experience, and not simply the building in which it occurs.
“…T o the Editor: The analysis of publicly funded home births in Australia by Catling‐Paull and colleagues 1 contains some significant gaps that require clarification. Without accurate information, women may not be fully informed about their childbirth choices.…”
“…T o the Editor: The recent article by Catling‐Paull and colleagues 1 documents the apparently very low perinatal mortality associated with state‐funded homebirth, mostly among women in Western Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catling‐Paull et al 1 state that the evidence surrounding the safety and benefits of homebirth remains contentious. I disagree — the benefits are contentious but the lack of safety is clear.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.