The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.5694/mja13.11003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years

Abstract: Conclusion: This study provides the first national evaluation of a significant proportion of women choosing publicly funded homebirth in Australia; however, the sample size does not have sufficient power to draw a conclusion about safety. More research is warranted into the safety of alternative places of birth within Australia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013). While the efficacy of such programs is beyond the scope of this article, the research on these programs offers compelling evidence of their success (Catling et al, 2014;Catling-Paull et al, 2012;McMurtrie et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013). While the efficacy of such programs is beyond the scope of this article, the research on these programs offers compelling evidence of their success (Catling et al, 2014;Catling-Paull et al, 2012;McMurtrie et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs are government funded, and have strict eligibility guidelines (see Catling-Paull, Foureur, & Homer, 2012), which the pregnant/birthing woman must comply with or her participation in the program will be cancelled. These programs are relatively new in Australia, the first being established in Perth, Western Australia in 1996, but most since 2005 (Catling-Paull, Coddington, Foureur, & Homer, 2013). These programs are becoming increasingly popular, with 12 hospitals nation-wide offering publicly funded programs (Catling-Paull et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T o the Editor: The analysis of publicly funded home births in Australia by Catling‐Paull and colleagues 1 contains some significant gaps that require clarification. Without accurate information, women may not be fully informed about their childbirth choices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T o the Editor: The recent article by Catling‐Paull and colleagues 1 documents the apparently very low perinatal mortality associated with state‐funded homebirth, mostly among women in Western Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catling‐Paull et al 1 state that the evidence surrounding the safety and benefits of homebirth remains contentious. I disagree — the benefits are contentious but the lack of safety is clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%