Publications pattern of clinical epilepsy research in Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Objective:To assess the progress in the field clinical epilepsy in Saudi Arabia, by analyzing in depth the research output productivity and publication pattern, and to identify the current situation of epilepsy research and offer solutions.Method:Literature search strategy was designed to retrieve accessible articles that are related to epilepsy utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. The retrieved articles were analyzed with several parameters, then evaluated using Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine level of evidence scale.Results:Of all identified articles, 90 were conducted in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and therefore were included. The included articles had a frequency of only 3.5 publications per year, and growth of 24.4% between the periods of 1990-2003 and 2004-2016. Only 13.3% of the articles were related to surgical epilepsy but the majority (86.7%) were related to medical epilepsy. Many articles (53.3%) were level III studies. The most common study design was retrospective studies in 35.6%, and the citations number ranged from 1–289 (Mean=7).Conclusion:Pattern of publications in clinical epilepsy researches revealed a slow growth rate in the frequency and a lower significance in the quality throughout the past 26 years. Active institutional and national promotion of clinical research is needed to help assess and therefore improve the quality of the provided epilepsy services.

Contribution of Pathologists in Leading Clinical Cancer Research Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Saudi Arabia

“…Other multiple studies examined the publications by Saudi surgeons and physicians on plastic, orthopedic, epilepsy, gastroenterology, spine, and abdominal surgery [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Their findings were mostly consistent with our findings in this study in regard to LOE and lack of clinical randomized trials.…”

Surgical Treatment of Congenital Kyphosis in Children: Report of a Rare Complication of Remote Cerebellar Haemorrhage

“…Remote cerebellar haemorrhage is not a common complication of spinal surgical procedures, consisting of approximately 0.08%-0.6% as reported in the current literature, first reported in 1981 [ 6 - 8 ]. Surgical instrumentation of the lumbosacral spine led most frequently to post-operative RCH [ 9 ].…”

Comment on: Oncology research in Saudi Arabia over a 10-year period. A synopsis

“…5 The choice of using it was based on similar previously reported studies. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Similarly, the impact factor should not be considered an absolute measure of research impact. There are other more sophisticated measures of quality and impact of healthcare research.…”