Publication rates of abstracts presented at the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists annual scientific meetings: Any change since 2004?

Croker, J.; Bydder, Sean

doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12721

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is noticed that the rates of publication in the meetings organized by prestigious organizations in other fields in recent years vary between 10.4% and 50.7%, while the average publication rate is 28.2% (Table 7) [9,17,21–29]. In the present study, it can be said that the publication rates calculated for both meetings are approximately at the average level when compared to other organizations.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 46%

“…However, peer‐reviewed publications help to evaluate the design, methods, and results of an article more rigorously than abstract paper acceptance. Scientific congress committees, on the contrary, accept or reject papers on the basis of the minimal information given to them through abstract papers [3,4,9]. Acceptance of an abstract at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) meeting is prestigious, but publishing the study in a peer‐reviewed journal provides the ultimate confirmation of the research findings [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual scientific meetings held by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 2011 and 2016

Sezgin¹,

Karadayı

2021

Journal of Forensic Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research evaluating the papers presented in forensic sciences in international meetings is scant. This study determines the possible predictions concerning publications by comparing the publication rates, publication years, and presentation types, time until publication, participating countries, and criteria of the published journals in the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). The publication rates of abstracts presented at scientific meetings of AAFS, a prestigious forensic science organization, along with the aforementioned components and the extent of their contribution in 2011 and 2016 were

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 46%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual scientific meetings held by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 2011 and 2016

Sezgin¹,

Karadayı

2021

Journal of Forensic Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 4 For Australian medical scientific meetings, publication rates for presented research have been reported between 26% and 41%. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 For international orthopaedic and orthopaedic subspecialty meetings, publication rates for presented research are between 24% and 67%. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 For Australian medical scientific meetings, publication rates for presented research have been reported between 26% and 41%. [5][6][7][8][9] For international orthopaedic and orthopaedic subspecialty meetings, publication rates for presented research are between 24% and 67%. The Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting (AOA ASM) is one of the key scientific meetings for orthopaedic surgery and musculoskeletal health in Australia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting

Balhatchet

Schütze

Awais

et al. 2022

ANZ Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Presentations at scientific conferences are an important method of research dissemination, with abstracts often used to inform clinical practice. Abstract to publication ratio is a commonly used tool for determining meeting quality. The aim of this study was to determine the publication rate for abstracts presented at the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting (AOA ASM) between 2012 and 2015 inclusive and identify reasons for non-publication. Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to determine whether each abstract presented at AOA ASMs between 2012 and 2015 was associated with a full text publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Where a publication could not be located, the presenter was contacted to confirm the reason for non-publication. Results: A total of 1130 abstracts were submitted (951 oral and 179 posters), and 573 resulted in full-text peer-reviewed publications (51%). The majority of publications (73%) were published within 2 years of presentation. There was no difference in likelihood of publication for oral presentations compared to posters, nor in the rate of publication across the 4 years of meetings. Common reasons for non-publication were lack of time (32%), publication considered low priority (27%) and journal rejections (22%). Conclusion:The overall publication rate for abstracts presented at the AOA ASM is 51%, which is an increase from the 1998 ASM (31%). This publication rate is higher than many similar Australian meetings and on par with other international orthopaedic and subspecialty meetings. Future research should investigate potential publication bias and methods to minimise barriers to publication.

show abstract

“…This comparison was expected to show an improvement in the rates and identify publication trends. Previously, only 2 similar studies that investigated if any change had occurred in the publication rates of the same meeting over time were published 10, 11. In the first of these studies, 10 an improvement in abstract to publication ratio was observed between 2 meetings, and in the second 11 the publication rate was found to be reduced.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 23rd (2013) and 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses: We are not improving

Bagatur¹,

Yalçınkaya²

2019

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine 1) the publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses in peer-reviewed journals and (2) compare these rates with publication rates from the 20th congress (2007) published previously. The secondary objective was to determine the time lag to publication and compare this data with the data from the 20th congress.MethodsAll abstracts from the scientific programs of the 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses were identified and computerized PubMed searches were conducted to determine whether an abstract had been followed by publication of a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals. The time lag to publication was also noted.ResultsOf the 993 presentation abstracts (302 podium and 691 poster presentations) from the 23rd congress and of the 940 presentation abstracts (310 podium and 630 poster presentations) from the 24th congress, 278 (28%) and 234 (24.9%) were followed by a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals indexed by PubMed, respectively. The rates of publication of the podium and poster presentations were 39.4% (119/302) and 23% (159/691), respectively from the 23rd and 37.7% (117/310) and 18.6% (117/630), respectively from the 24th congresses. The mean time to publication of the abstracts from the 23rd congress was 12.8 ± 18.8 (median: 13, range: −140 to 47) months and the mean time to publication of the abstracts from the 24th congress was 11.1 ± 14.42 (median: 11, range: −73 to 39) months. Fifty (50/278, 18%) abstracts from the 23rd congress (mean −11, range: [−32]−[−1], median −5 months) and 37 (37/234, 15.8%) abstracts from the 24th congress (mean −10.4, range: [−73]−[−1], median −4 months) were published as full-text articles prior to the presentation at the congress.ConclusionThe vast majority of abstracts presented at 23rd (2013) and the 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses were not followed by publication of a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals. The publication rates of the abstracts presented at these congresses did not improve when compared with the 20th (2007) congress.

show abstract

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists annual scientific meetings: Any change since 2004?

Abstract: Publication rates are comparable with international reports. The APR has increased since the previous study for both disciplines, but more so for Radiation Oncology.

Cited by 3 publications

References 26 publications

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual scientific meetings held by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 2011 and 2016

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual scientific meetings held by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 2011 and 2016

Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting

Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 23rd (2013) and 24th (2014) National Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Congresses: We are not improving

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About