Publication Productivity of Bsw Faculty

Johnson, H. Wayne; Hull, Grafton H.

doi:10.1080/10437797.1995.10672271

Cited by 17 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Auspice. Auspice has been defined as a college or university's source of primary funding ( Johnson and Hull, 1995). Traditionally, a public auspice denotes that programmatic funding comes from state budgets.…”

Section: Comparing Reputation Vs H-index Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A private auspice denotes that funding is from student tuition and other sources of funding from the private sector. There is conflicting research on how auspice affects academic productivity; some studies found advantages for private auspice ( Jordan et al, 1989) while others have demonstrated the opposite ( Johnson and Hull, 1995;Suryani et al, 2013).…”

Section: Comparing Reputation Vs H-index Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparing reputation vs h-index rankings of doctoral programs

Smith

Carter

Osteen

et al. 2018

JARHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study builds on previous investigations on the scholarship of social work faculty using h-index scores. The purpose of this paper is to compare two methods of determining the excellence of social work doctoral programs. Design/methodology/approach This study compared rankings in 75 social work doctoral programs using h-index vs the US News and World Report (USNWR) list. The accuracy of predicting scholarly productivity from USNWR rankings was determined by joint membership in the same quantile block. Information on USNWR rankings, h-index, years of experience, academic rank, and faculty gender were collected. Regression analysis was used in creating a predictive model. Findings Only 39 percent of USNWR rankings accurately predicted which programs had their reputation and scholarly productivity in the same rating block. Conversely, 41 percent of programs had reputations in a higher block than their scholarly productivity would suggest. The regression model showed that while h-index was a strong predictor of USNWR rank (b=0.07, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.08), additional variance was explained by the unique contributions of faculty size (b=0.01, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.02), college age (b=0.002, 95% CI: <0.001, 0.003), and location in the southeast (b=−0.22, 95% CI: −0.39, −0.06). Originality/value For many programs, reputation and scholarly productivity coincide. Other programs have markedly different results between the two ranking systems. Although mean program h-indices are the best predictor of USNWR rankings, caution should be used in making statements about inclusion in the “top 10” or “top 20” programs.

show abstract

Section: Comparing Reputation Vs H-index Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparing Reputation Vs H-index Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing reputation vs h-index rankings of doctoral programs

Smith

Carter

Osteen

et al. 2018

JARHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A. SuzANNE Bovo is assistant professo r, University of Kansas. (Bloom & Klein, 1995;Corcoran & Kirk, 1990;Green, Baskind, & Conklin, 1995;Johnson & Hull, 1995;Kirk, 1984;Ligon, Thyer, & Dixon, 1995;Thyer & Bentley, 1986;Thyer , Boynton, Bennis, & Levine , 1994) . These studies demonstrated that fac ulties of schools with doc toral degree programs consistently publish more juried articles and achieve higher per capita rates ofjournal publication than faculties of institutions granting only bachelor's degrees, master's degrees, or both.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Getting Beyond the Productivity Gap

Green

Baskind

Best

et al. 1997

Journal of Social Work Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Moreover, Fraser's (1994) indictment of social work's core literature -inadequate and rudimentary methods that are still weaker than those employed by nonsocial workers who published in the same journals -assesses the quality of faculty productivity, such as it is. In fact, the faculty productivity in BSW programs is so low that it undercuts their claims to standing in higher education (Johnson & Hull, 1995); experiential knowledge is more wisely gained through apprenticeships in social service agencies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Don't Jump, Mother Loves You: The Rescue of Social Work From the Suicide of Its Own Research

Epstein

2005

Hong Kong J. Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Instead of trying to improve its very inadequate research by yet another rededication to rationality, social work should take cognizance of its consistent failure across fifty years to produce any scientifically credible social service assessments. The pursuit of rationality in social work obscures its political acquiescence, a fable of the Arctic midgerby. The corrective myths of its research stunt the professional coming of age of social work and may well lead to its demise. Rather than social science, social criticism is more consistent with the field's traditions, inclinations, and capacities.

show abstract

Publication Productivity of Bsw Faculty

Cited by 17 publications

References 9 publications

Comparing reputation vs h-index rankings of doctoral programs

Comparing reputation vs h-index rankings of doctoral programs

Getting Beyond the Productivity Gap

Don't Jump, Mother Loves You: The Rescue of Social Work From the Suicide of Its Own Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About