2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Publication of Positive Studies in the Urologic Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While pregabalin was not shown to be effective in this clinical instance, we applaud The Journal and study authors for publishing results from a “negative trial.” Publication bias is a major issue within the urological literature, with some journals publishing negative results in only 3% of reported trials. 5 Without publication of these studies our knowledge becomes skewed. A recent editorial commentary by DeVito and Goldacre acknowledged this and called on the scientific community to improve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pregabalin was not shown to be effective in this clinical instance, we applaud The Journal and study authors for publishing results from a “negative trial.” Publication bias is a major issue within the urological literature, with some journals publishing negative results in only 3% of reported trials. 5 Without publication of these studies our knowledge becomes skewed. A recent editorial commentary by DeVito and Goldacre acknowledged this and called on the scientific community to improve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%