Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process

Abstract

Research on public participation in community planning processes often focuses on the design of participation activities and the tensions therein. Past research, however, gives little attention to the question of who makes these design decisions, what public values they hold, and how those values affect decisions about design. Addressing this gap, this study empirically illustrates the connection between public value frames, design choices, and public participation in a collaborative policymaking process. The case analyzed is a local public planning process designed collaboratively by public and private organizations. The analysis uses participant observation, documents, and interviews. Results demonstrate how effective collaborative governance of the design process and interorganizational power-sharing forced partners to reveal, recognize, and interrogate their own public values while navigating others’ values. The collaborative governance of the planning process allowed the organizations to capitalize on, rather than suffer from, differences in values frames by changing tensions in planning to opportunities and increasing equity in public participation. Findings suggest that research attention should be aimed not just at which stakeholders are invited to participate (and how), but at who designs the participation agenda in the first place. Furthermore, findings suggest that public values frame reflection and collaborative governance of participation design can be key practices improving planning and policy outputs.

How to Rebuild the Quality of Public Services at the Local Government Level During the Covid-19 Pandemic from the Transaction Cost Theory Perspective

“…In the ex post phase, there is then no need for additional contract security for its execution. Certainty of contract execution is guaranteed by the selection of the public organisation (Clark, 2020).…”

Accountability in Collaborative Federal Programs—Multidimensional and Multilevel Performance Measures Needed: The Case of Wildland Fire Prevention

“…So, in determining how to collaborate, public managers along with their partners should think critically about the nature of their joint work, the expected duration of their joint activities, the level of investment they are willing to make in the collaborative process, and the kind of public value they want to generate (Prentice et al, 2019). The task is complex in that there are many public values at play (Clark, 2021).…”

The reflection of public values in twitter use of metropolitan municipalities: A content analysis employing the analytic hierarchy process

“…For this very purpose, we want to see whether and how MMs in Turkey are eager to take the input from their stakeholders, including citizens in a collaborative and participative manner through their Twitter accounts. As asserted by Clark (2021), in collaborative governance what is important is "which stakeholders are invited to participate (and how), but at who designs the participation agenda in the first place" (p. 199). PVs are not supposed to denote just the substantive issues, but they also pertain to procedural issues for governance criteria like transparency, participation (Alford et al, 2017), and collaboration.…”