2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public support for forestry from EU funds – Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis focused on both a financial side (evaluation of allocated and really drawn means) and factual side (evaluation of measurement and use of individual measures). Details are described in Jarský et al (2014) and Jarský (2007) for the programming period 2000-2006 and in Sarvašová et al (2010) and Špičková and Jarský (2013) for the period 2007-2013.…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis focused on both a financial side (evaluation of allocated and really drawn means) and factual side (evaluation of measurement and use of individual measures). Details are described in Jarský et al (2014) and Jarský (2007) for the programming period 2000-2006 and in Sarvašová et al (2010) and Špičková and Jarský (2013) for the period 2007-2013.…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of agricultural subsidies on farm performance in practice has been widely analysed, mainly in terms of crop production (Quiroga et al, 2017;Kumbhakar and Lien, 2010). However, there is little research on the efficiency of the complex support from the rural development programmes to forestry (e.g., Jarský et al, 2014, Uthes et al, 2017. Some others have focused on specific programmes related to agroforestry (Brescancin et al, 2017, Desjeux et al, 2014, Sarvašová et al 2017 or to specific measures that address agriculture and forestry jointly (Caruso et al, 2015, Sin andNowak, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hynynen et al (2014) conducted the SWOT analysis to analyse Finnish forestry sector's operational environment and to define scenarios for the assessment of long-term impacts of alternative forest management strategies on potential resource use (Hynynen et al, 2015). Also, the SWOT analysis was used in the cases of forest management in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (Jarský et al, 2014), Algeria (Meddour-Sahar, 2015), Kyrgyzstan (Jalilova et al, 2012), Bulgaria (Winkel & Sotirov, 2011), Italia (Carbone & Savelli, 2009) and Austria (Rauch, 2007). Very rarely, the objects of the SWOT analysis were management issues regarding forest roads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very rarely, the objects of the SWOT analysis were management issues regarding forest roads. In those cases, forest roads were analysed mainly from the wider perspective, as part of forest infrastructure (Meddour-Sahar, 2015), or from the investment perspective (Jarský et al, 2014), but not as a final aim of the SWOT analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%