2015
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Support for Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Point-of-Sale Provisions: Results of a National Study

Abstract: Objectives We assessed public and smoker support for enacted and potential point-of-sale (POS) tobacco-control policies under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Methods We surveyed a US nationally representative sample of 17 507 respondents (6595 smokers) in January through February 2013, and used linear regression to calculate weighted point estimates and identify factors associated with support for POS policies among adults and smokers. Results Overall, nonsmokers were more supportive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
35
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(74 reference statements)
7
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(GfK Knowledge Networks 2015) GfK provides those in non-Internet households with a computer and internet access. The GfK panel is increasingly used in public health research(Rose, Emery et al 2015) and provides the unique opportunity to test how exposure to narrative communication strategies about SMI affect attitudes among a national sample of adult participants. The experiment was fielded over a 13-day period from March 21-April 2, 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(GfK Knowledge Networks 2015) GfK provides those in non-Internet households with a computer and internet access. The GfK panel is increasingly used in public health research(Rose, Emery et al 2015) and provides the unique opportunity to test how exposure to narrative communication strategies about SMI affect attitudes among a national sample of adult participants. The experiment was fielded over a 13-day period from March 21-April 2, 2016.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point of sale display bans achieved high compliance and public support in Ireland and Norway [26], and in Thailand, an evaluation of its 2005 ban found high support among smokers [16]. A study of public support of marketing and point of sale bans in the United States found low support [27], and an evaluation of a point of sale ban is currently underway in the United Kingdom [28]. Prior research has found that airports are not necessarily subject to in-country or local smoke-free legislation [2], thus a concerted effort among smoke-free advocates and policy makers may be required to implement a TAPS ban.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terry and Zhang (2016) would seem to concur; their study of smoking policy effectiveness found that policy enforcement was significantly more effective for reducing smoking rates than simply policy provision. Rose et al (2015) had similarly low findings of public support for smoking and tobacco control point of sale informational provisions with widespread support only enjoyed with provisions related to restricted access to smoking products by minors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terry and Zhang (2016) would seem to concur; their study of smoking policy effectiveness found that policy enforcement was significantly more effective for reducing smoking rates than simply policy provision. Rose et al (2015) had similarly low findings of public support for smoking and tobacco control point of sale informational provisions with widespread support only enjoyed with provisions related to restricted access to smoking products by minors.In addition to linguistic diversity, such as that demonstrated in California and Texas, Ozolins (2010) posited the existence of three additional factors that impact language service policy: reliance on public sector finance, institution-led factors, and cross-sectoral interpreting needs. These factors would seem to argue for a strong presence of multiple language versions of public policy by state institutions, which are financed by public funding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%