Public Spending, Quality of Bureaucracy and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Analysis

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical framework to investigate the relationship between public spending and economic growth, where public spending provides both productive capital and unproductive services. We take into account the quality of bureaucracy with the possibility of rent-seeking motives. A key feature of the model is that it distinguishes between utility enhancing and productivity enhancing public spending. In the absence of rent-seeking motives, the paper demonstrates that public spending will promote economic growth only if marginal productivity of spending is high enough to offset the potential output loss due to increased taxation. In the presence of rent-seeking, however, the impact of public spending on economic growth depends on the quality of bureaucracy and how the latter impinges upon the rentseeking behaviour. The analysis shows that while improvement in bureaucratic quality would unambiguously raise the share of utility enhancing public spending, its impact on economic growth would depend on how bureaucratic quality influences the relative magnitudes of the two types of public spending as well as on how far bureaucratic extraction will be controlled as a result of improvement in bureaucratic quality. Bureaucratic extraction is likely to be minimised with strong institutions and effective monitoring and accountability mechanisms thereby improving the prospects of economic growth. JEL Classification: C61, D23, D61, D73, H50 Keywords: Rent-seeking, Quality of Bureaucracy, Public Goods, Public Expenditures

The Impact of Government Expenditures, Gross Capital Formation, Trade, and Portfolio Investment on the Economic Growth of Asean Economies

“…The other independent variables are gross capital formation, portfolio investment, labor, trade, total reserve and gross savings. Using time series approach, Pradhan et al (2015), Odhiambo (2018) and Naseer (2019) found the same result for the relationship between government expenditure and ECNG. Pradhan et al (2015) investigate the relationship in Greek from year 1960 to 2001, Fawwaz (2016) performed their study in Nigeria from year 1977 to 2012 and Odhiambo (2018) test the relationship for ASEAN-5 countries from year 1960 to 2002.…”

“…GSP is increasing over the years. Naseer (2019) conclude that productive PEXs may become unproductive if misallocating and using it in excess. Evidence from Kurniawan (2016) shows that fiscal stimulus does contribute to rapid economy recovery in the ASEAN-5 countries after the financial crisis in 2008.…”

“…In some cases, government expenditure does not have a significant relationship with ECNG. Naseer (2019) conclude that productive PEXs may become unproductive if misallocating and using it in excess.…”

“…Pradhan et al (2015) agree with Wagner's Law. Naseer (2019) conclude that governments spend money for certain goals. For example, to increase per-capita income.…”

Shaping Economic Growth of Thailand Through Crude Oil Dynamics: Role of Its Exploration, Consumption and Prices

“…Economic development of a country is taken as key macroeconomic variable to measure the health of the economy and living standards of the aboriginals. Literature on economic growth highlights various contributing factor of economic growth including labor, capital, investment, government expenditures, human capital, trust, and financial inclusion (Naseer, 2019). The growing demand of crude oil for energy generation has enhanced its role in GDP growth.…”