2018
DOI: 10.2478/aup-2018-0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Spaces of Kaunas from the Inter-War Period to Contemporary: Content Analysis

Abstract: This research demonstrates the potential of content analysis method in urban research in the context of the study of modernization of Lithuanian cities during the Soviet period and its influence on contemporary urbanism. The content analysis of visual material (photographs, postcards and other images) is integrated as one of the methods of the study, allowing to identify the social phenomena in public spaces and their changes throughout the period from the inter-war era to contemporary. The descriptive analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of uses characteristic to sociotope methodology was integrated into developed coding categories; the categories defined within the sociotope methodology were used to identify the types of activities taking place in public spaces. The application of content analysis software allowed generating quantitative results that were applied in the further steps of the study and general qualitative conclusions [16]. However, for the finalization of the research deeper qualitative insights were necessary on how interaction between urban spaces, their users and the activities of these users evolved and changed in the periods under analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of uses characteristic to sociotope methodology was integrated into developed coding categories; the categories defined within the sociotope methodology were used to identify the types of activities taking place in public spaces. The application of content analysis software allowed generating quantitative results that were applied in the further steps of the study and general qualitative conclusions [16]. However, for the finalization of the research deeper qualitative insights were necessary on how interaction between urban spaces, their users and the activities of these users evolved and changed in the periods under analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%