Public Space as Contested Space: The Battle over the Use, Meaning and Function of Public Space

Abstract

Abstract-Background:The optimists among the public space scholarship argue that instead of a well-organized, carefully concerted and highly controlled urban social life, what unfolds in regulated public spaces are a mé lange of manifold incongruous lifestyles and a spatial condition. Thistheoretical proposition claims that public spaces are contested spaces offering a potent description of everyday reality in privatized public spaces like the shopping mall. But is a similar mechanics available outside the developed world? Objective: The study looked into the empirical validity of the urban spatial experiences of a developing country like the Philippines. Method: Case study method is employed. Verbal and observational data were analyzed using the process of pattern matching. Findings: Evidence indicates that oppositional politics exists in the public spaces of the privatized built environments. And this oppositional politics springs from three competing conceptualizations: the "by us", "for us", and "up to us" mentalities. Lessons Learned: Public space is not just about regulation; it is also about opposition. But unlike traditional forms of oppositional politics, these are not organized conquest of mall spaces; instead, they simply are individual acts of passive defiance.

To be unworthy of national stage. Women’s disobedience as performative practices

“…The National Theater was deprived, as it seems, of the status of what Habermas named public sphere, in which private people exchanegd and discussed their political ideas and "come together as a public" (Habermas 1991, 27). Instead, protesters in front of the theatre attempted to make it a place reserved mainly for those who stick to the hegemonic vision of social order, carefully selected citizens and a homogeneous discourse of memory subject to social control (Capulong 2016). On August 5, neither the theater nor the main streets of Rijeka were granted the status of what Don Mitchell characterized as a "normative" ideal for public space (1995), in which one can meet people and ideas that are polemical and dialogical.…”

The Participant Journey Map: Understanding the Design of Interactive Augmented Play Spaces

“…(Semi-)Public spaces can facilitate a variety and diversity of functions, and be places for self-expression, exchange, protest and social engagement (Harrouk, 2020). They regulate human behavior but also allow constitution and expression of individual identity (Capulong Reyes, 2016) and facilitate exposure to different types of people (Harrouk, 2020), enabling both creation and disruption of social encounters (Stavrides, 2016).…”