Public Services as a Strategy of Regulation

Lanneau, Régis

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70530-5_1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, this work considers that private interests are part of public ones. On the other hand, it argues that public services should be considered a regulatory strategy (Lanneau, 2021), as a given regulation has to lead the state to adopt policies to overcome its negative effects.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods of regulatory impact assessment: critical analysis and alternative method

El Kadiri Boutchich

2023

JFRC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to carry out a critical analysis of the methods used to deal with the regulatory impact assessment while proposing an alternative method to overcome some of the drawbacks of the aforementioned methods. Design/methodology/approach To achieve the objective of this work, the methods currently used in regulatory impact analysis are presented by highlighting their scope and the problems they may pose during their applications. After that, the adjusted variant of radial measure is suggested as an alternative method to the aforementioned methods while showing its relevance with regard to other methods using pertinent criteria. Finally, for concretization, a case study related to the sanctions against Russia after its invasion of Ukraine is presented. Findings The findings show that regulations related to the sanctions against Russia are good enough, with a score of 0.846. However, this score is less good in several countries like Germany (0.671), Italy (0.677) and France (0.745) and in the poorest countries. Originality/value The originality of this work resides in using a novel method in the regulatory impact analysis field, which is adjusted variant of radial measure. This method increases the effectiveness of the regulatory impact assessment.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%