Public service broadcasting, public interest and individual rights in China

Abstract

This article argues that China's public service broadcasting (PSB) policy has been motivated more by the pragmatic ends of securing social stability and cohesion than by moral or humane concerns for the development of citizens. Actual PSB policy focused predominantly on a narrowly defined 'basic cultural right' of access to broadcast media and on social equalization between urban and rural access to broadcast networks. Other values of PSB, including high-quality programming, independence and impartiality, are still marginalized. The continuation of consensus on the authoritarian political model and the prioritization of social order and collective rights over individual political and civil rights has restricted the scope of the policy. The lack of consensus on the substance of the public interest undermines any meaningful political construction of PSB. The longterm implications of PSB policy depend on the legitimation of the discourse of individual rights and equality, and on recognition of the broadcast media's role in independently serving the public and common good and of the state's obligation to respect individuals as citizens having equal and unalienable rights.

Disciplining Desiring Subjects through the Remodeling of Masculinity

“…In postsocialist China, 3 media control is an important mechanism of what Weller (2008) terms “responsive authoritarianism.” According to Weller (2008: 128), to maintain one-party rule, the Chinese party-state has developed a number of innovative techniques to present the government as being responsive to public opinion. The mechanism to accommodate popular demands into policy-making is shaped by governmental responses of tolerance, responsiveness, persuasion, and repression (Chin, 2012; Reilly, 2012; Cairns, 2013). Because the key issue in this dynamic is how to receive and respond to public demand, media control becomes a crucial part of the responsive authoritarian regime (Nathan, 2003).…”