2010
DOI: 10.1177/160940691000900101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Selves, Inequality, and Interruptions: The Creation of Meaning in Focus Groups with Teens

Abstract: Focus groups have received substantial attention over the past few decades, particularly as they are considered to provide rich, interactive data, yet only occasionally do researchers discuss the process of conducting focus groups with young people. This paper contributes to wider debates on focus groups through engagement with three interrelated topics, each with unique reflection on focus groups with teenagers: the advantages of focus group interactions, particularly in relation to hierarchies of age and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…program participants in the second group. Trust and rapport, especially important in focus groups with teenagers, had been previously established (Raby, ). Focus groups were held at the SBHCs and lasted between 40 and 45 minutes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…program participants in the second group. Trust and rapport, especially important in focus groups with teenagers, had been previously established (Raby, ). Focus groups were held at the SBHCs and lasted between 40 and 45 minutes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gaining a comprehensive understanding of adolescent leadership recent studies have recognized that it is particularly important to provide students with an opportunity to express their point of view on this concept (Dempster et al, 2010;Raby, 2010). By gaining this perspective, educators can be more in tuned with the adolescent understanding and practice of leadership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This method was selected as it provides further understanding about each protagonist's reality, also ensuring exchanges and reactions within the group about questions, concerns, and other issues (Gauthier, 2009;Kamberelis & Dimitriadis, 2013;Veal, 2011). This type of interview is also regarded as the closest to youth in ways of interaction and communication (Eder & Fingerson, 2002;Raby, 2010).…”
Section: Methodological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%