2005
DOI: 10.1086/431180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Schools in Marketized Environments: Shifting Incentives and Unintended Consequences of Competition‐Based Educational Reforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Advocates argue that charter schools provide innovative educational programs, raise student achievement, offer alternatives to parents, and foster positive competition for traditional public schools (King, 2004;Yancey, 2004). Opponents charge that charter schools have diluted resources that the school districts are entitled to and have promoted racial enclaves within districts (Finn, Manno, & Vanourek, 2000;Lubienski, 2003Lubienski, & 2005. To date, there is still no consistent evidence that charter schools are performing significantly better than traditional public schools (Johnson, 2011;Zimmer, Blanc, Gill, & Christman, 2008).…”
Section: Challenging Mainstream Discourse On Diversity: Schools' Agenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates argue that charter schools provide innovative educational programs, raise student achievement, offer alternatives to parents, and foster positive competition for traditional public schools (King, 2004;Yancey, 2004). Opponents charge that charter schools have diluted resources that the school districts are entitled to and have promoted racial enclaves within districts (Finn, Manno, & Vanourek, 2000;Lubienski, 2003Lubienski, & 2005. To date, there is still no consistent evidence that charter schools are performing significantly better than traditional public schools (Johnson, 2011;Zimmer, Blanc, Gill, & Christman, 2008).…”
Section: Challenging Mainstream Discourse On Diversity: Schools' Agenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…School choice has been introduced as an education policy instrument for reshaping public education into consumer-oriented education in this region. This policy issue is based on the assumption, that competition among schools, which is caused by parents' choice, may be a fundamental factor improving the quality of education (Lubienski 2005). For supporting effective public school choice for both students and parents, many types of policy instruments, including Magnet school, Charter school, and Voucher program, have been initiated from the state or local government.…”
Section: An Overview Of Education Policy Research In the Past Decadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding is an explicit recognition of some limitations of the school-choice policy. Current school-choice policy also encourages parents to leave their neighborhood schools for high performing schools, a practice many resist for various reasons, included convenience, familiarity and the community (Schneider et al 2000;Bulkley and Fisler 2003;Lubienski 2005).…”
Section: Brown V Board Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Market driven school reform that is focused on choice and competition was first introduced in the 1950s and 60s by Milton Friedman as a potential way to restructure the education system (Lubienski 2005;Moe 2008;Ravitch 2010;Loeb et al 2011). He argued it would empower people to make choices by increasing competition in the educational marketplace.…”
Section: School Choice Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation