Public responses to COVID‐19 case disclosure and their spatial implications

Abstract

We study how the public changes their mobility and retail spending patterns as precautionary responses to the disclosed location of COVID-19 cases. To look into the underlying mechanisms, we investigate how such change varies spatially and whether there is any spatial spillover or substitution. We use the daily data of cell phone-based mobility and credit card transactions between February 10 and May 31 in both 2019 and 2020 in Seoul, South Korea, and employ the empirical approach analyzing the yearover-year percent change for the mobility and consumption outcomes. Results report that one additional COVID-19 case within the last 14 days decreased nonresident inflow and retail spending by 0.40 and 0.65 percentage points, respectively. Then, we also find evidence of spatial heterogeneity: the mobility and retail performances of neighborhoods with higher residential population density were more resilient to COVID-19 case information while neighborhoods with higher levels of land-use diversity and retail agglomeration experienced a greater localized demand shock. This heterogeneity is not negligible. For example, one additional COVID-19 case in neighborhoods in the bottom 20% for population density led to a decline of 1.2 percentage points in retail spending, while other neighborhoods experienced a less negative impact. Finally,

Geographic Restrictions for COVID-19 Stimulus Spending and Public Health Outcomes: Evidence from Big Data in Seoul, South Korea

“…Therefore, we could directly observe the use of stimulus payments, unlike other studies that could only observe overall credit card spending patterns. [20][21][22] For all analyses, we exclude the transactions that are likely to be non-physical consumption or where the consumer and merchant are not in the same location at the time of the transaction, such as transactions for e-commerce, public transport including taxies, voucher purchases, utility bills, and tax payments.…”

Metro travel and perceived COVID-19 infection risks: A case study of Hong Kong

“…The locally confirmed cases in a neighborhood and its adjacent areas could also impact people's perception and their travel to and from those areas. The findings have been generated in cities such as Seoul ( Lee & Lee, 2022 ) and Singapore (Janssen and Shapiro, 2021), where there exist COVID-19 dashboards that publicize detailed information about confirmed cases at different geographical levels over time.…”

“…Besides, income and educational levels can well predict the degree of risk perception. Together, they significantly impacted travel ( Lee & Lee, 2022 ; Ozbilen et al, 2021 ).…”

Online listing data and their interaction with market dynamics: evidence from Singapore during COVID-19

“…The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a significant change in consumers' housing preferences, especially with the dramatic increase in work-from-home (WFH) arrangements along with infection concerns [16,27,44,50,81]. Also, national lockdowns and social distancing measures have required people to conduct daily activities at home [39].…”