Public provision of emergency obstetric care: a case study in two districts of Pakistan

Abstract

ObjectivesPakistan is one out of five countries where together half of the global neonatal deaths occur. As the provision of services and facilities is one of the key elements vital to reducing this rate as well as the maternal mortality rate, this study investigates the status of the delivery of essential obstetric care provided by the public health sector in two districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2015 aiming to highlight areas where critical improvements are needed.SettingWe analysed data from a survey of 22 primary and secondary healthcare facilities as well as 85 community midwives (CMWs) in Haripur and Nowshera districts.ParticipantsUsing a structured questionnaire we evaluated the performance of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) signal functions and patient statistics in public health facilities. Also, 102 CMWs were interviewed about working hours, basic and specialised delivery service provision, referral system and patient statistics.Primary outcome measuresWe investigate the public provision of emergency obstetric care using seven key medical services identified by the United Nations (UN).ResultsDeliveries by public health cadres account for about 30% of the total number of births in these districts. According to the UN benchmark, only a small fraction of basic EmOC (2/18) and half of the comprehensive EmOC (2/4) facilities of the recommended minimum number were available to the population in both districts. Only a minority of health facilities and CMWs carry out several signal functions. Only 8% of the total births in one of the study districts are performed in public EmOC health facilities.ConclusionsBoth districts show a significant shortage of available public EmOC service provisions. Development priorities need to be realigned to improve the availability, accessibility and quality of EmOC service provisions by the public health sector alongside with existing activities to increase institutional births.

What to scale first? A cross-sectional analysis of factors affecting cesarean delivery rates at first referral units in Bihar, India

“…This finding reflects the fact that a shortage of the obstetric workforce constitutes an important barrier to safe caesarean delivery. Similar observations have been reported by Ntambue et al, from the Democratic Republic of Congo, as well as from Bruckmann et al in Pakistan [ 33 , 34 ]. These studies reinforce the importance of investment in human capital and a strong obstetrical workforce.…”

Predictors of Birth Asphyxia among neonates in Dodoma Region Tanzania: A matched case-control study

“…In Tanzania, the mortality rate accounts for 32 death per 1000 live birth and 68 per 1000 live birth for infants, the main cause was (pneumonia 29%, birth asphyxia 27% and preterm birth 23%) (8). Comprehensive intervention in neonatal resuscitation including appropriate and timely Helping Baby Breathing (HBB) training, Basic Emergency Obstetric Care (BEmOC), and Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care (CEmOC) reduced the burden of mortality and morbidity by 47% and 24% for fresh stillbirth (9).…”

“…Despite the efforts such as timely Helping Baby Breathing (HBB) Basic Emergency Obstetric Care (BEmOC) and Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care (CEmOC) made by the stakeholders to overcome the chis challenge (9), neonatal morbidity and mortality persist due to BA. The problem is more pronounced in Tanzanian settings and several factors have been implicated in this growing problem.…”

Professional competition amidst intractable maternal mortality: Midwifery in rural Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…A more targeted effort to train community midwives was introduced in 2006, supplementing the existing LHW Programme. This more recent drive has been described as an effort to replace the untrained, traditional midwives rather than cooperate with them ( Brückmann et al, 2019 ).…”