Public Procurement Management as a Factor of National Sustainability (the Case of KPI Implementation in Russia)

Abstract

In the context of international mutual economic restrictions, Russian contract system is becoming a relevant tool to solve problems in domestic policy. There is no single model to assess the effectiveness of procurement system in the world practice. In Russia, the assessment of this system performance is done by a number of executive authorities for their specific purposes. It is necessary to create an intelligent system of key performance indicators for public management budget procurement. Such system is required for current and rapid adjustments of decisions at all levels of a complex and multiple public procurement system in the Russian Federation. The article summarizes the possibilities to use principles of key performance indicators methods for performance assessment of public procurement management in Russia. A more detailed performance examination of specific groups of participants in the procurement system ranged according to the management levels and regions will enable in an integrated manner to evaluate the relevance of each group to the world procurement standards, to the professional requirements and to the performance appropriateness in accordance with the set goals. The article presents the effect of the overall assessment of the procurement system in five main areas. Delayed assessment criteria are identified. It is pointed out that their effectiveness is appropriate to evaluate in dynamics.

The Global Digital Economy and the Spirit of Indonesian "Product" Nationalism

“…Inequality and yet social, because while some individuals can quickly follow and adapt to developments in digital technology, others, especially those who live in remote rural areas, far from digital technology infrastructure, are unable to do so. According to (Zolochevskaya et al, 2019) developing countries will depend on countries that dominate the global digital economy market. Lack of public experience in using technology, digital platforms, payment systems, and legal norms, increases the risk of national economic instability, causing economic competitiveness and innovation, underdevelopment, and dependency (particularly in the financial sector) in developed and developing countries.…”

Analysis of risk and threats to financial performance of enterprises in agro-industrial complex

“…The assessment of the information about the external and internal environment of an enterprise is described in the KRISIS-analysis methodology, which makes it possible to determine the degree of its influence on business processes of an economic entity in crisis conditions for making effective decisions in management and strategic planning [5]. At the same time, the external environment determines both objective restrictions associated with the stages of public relations' development, and subjective limitations which, in particular, are connected with the sectoral policy for agricultural products [6], dynamics of exchange indicators [7], problems of the effectiveness of public procurement [8], and also the general level of innovation activity in the national economy [9].…”