Public – Private Partnerships as Catalysts for Community-Based Water Infrastructure Development: The Border WaterWorks Program in Texas and New Mexico Colonias

Abstract

Increased awareness of shortcomings in both provision and maintenance of public services is triggering new approaches to policymaking and service delivery. Conventional debates over public versus private service provision obscure the multiple configurations possible. We consider the effectiveness and desirability of an alternative approach to public-service provision of water and wastewater services, specifically the Border Waterworks program, which has helped deliver water-related services to economically disadvantaged communities ( colonias) along the US – Mexico border. We explore some issues that emerge when nonprofit organizations take on functions of governments and service providers, and examine the conditions under which the provision of water and wastewater infrastructure can be advanced by nonprofit organizations. We conclude that the general effectiveness of Border Waterworks was thanks to its ability to adapt to local circumstances and respond to situations as they arose in the context of the numerous problems in colonias. We also conclude that nonprofit providers are most effective when they serve as catalysts that assist the public sector rather than when they provide public-service infrastructure on their own.

Water Reform across the State/Society Divide: The Case of Ceará, Brazil

“…Indeed, one of the main organizing principles of PPPs is precisely their flexibility to adapt to local needs and resources. Although, traditionally, PPPs were mostly thought of as alternatives to 'big' and inefficient government, increasingly such partnerships are understood as a viable alternative both to outright privatization as well as to public provision of public goods (Lemos et al, 2002). This is particularly true in cases where there is little or no willingness from the for-profit private sector to engage in such relationships or where the implications of outright privatization might be too costly, politically and environmentally.…”

“…While traditionally PPPs have been defined as contractual agreements between a public agency (federal, state or local) and a for-profit corporation, 1 other forms of partnerships have emerged between governments and various non-profit private partners, such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private voluntary organizations (PVOs) and communities. The expansion of PPPs has been especially evident in the case of the delivery of water-related services to the poor where incentives for for-profit private business to participate might be low or absent (Lemos et al, 2002). To reflect such partnerships, new PPP conceptualizations encompass not only the established government-private business partners but also a wider range of actors and approaches combining public and private resources.…”

The Emergence of Associational Life in México’s Wild West: Pioneering Civic Participation, Sea Turtle Conservation, and Environmental Awareness in Baja California Sur

“…(and Mexico more generally) went beyond governmental/NGO relations and were compounded in part by the persistence of informal social rules. There existed a weak culture of philanthropy; lingering public distrust and cynicism toward NGOs (for fear of corruption and linkages to political parties); and longstanding citizen reliance upon, and expectations of the federal government to solve social and environmental problems (Sabet 2008;Lemos et al 2002). Dedina adds that as late as 2003 ''We were absolutely attacked.…”

Claiming Space, Claiming Water: Contested Legal Geographies of Water in South Texas

“…The legislature also created the Economically Distressed Areas Program (EDAP) to coordinate and fund various initiatives to improve water and sanitation infrastructure along the Texas-Mexico border. Attention to the water and sanitation crisis also led nonprofit organizations to design and implement community-based infrastructure programs (Lemos et al 2002). Despite two decades of infrastructure development and new land development regulations, colonias continued to expand.…”