Public private partnerships: a multidimensional model for contracting

Zarco-Jasso, Hugo

doi:10.1504/ijpp.2005.007791

Cited by 22 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The fourth hybrid characteristic is mixed ownership between public and private stakeholders (Vakkuri and Johanson, 2020, p. 11). The next hybrid characteristic is governance as hybrid organizations mix public and private forms of governance (Billis, 2010; Grossi et al , 2017; Zarco-Jasso, 2005). The sixth hybrid characteristic is control , implying that hybrid organizations may be subject to public and private forms of financial and social control, such as regulatory control of the markets, professional-self control and customer-driven market control (Vakkuri and Johanson, 2020, p. 11).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Governance (Grossi et al, 2020(Grossi et al, , 2017 Performance contracts, loan agreements, intermediate ownership structures and informal influence mechanisms (Grossi, 2022;Grossi and Thomasson, 2022;Okhmatovskiy et al, 2021) Private elections of governing committees and officers (Billis, 2010) Multiplicity of funding arrangements (Vakkuri et al, 2021) market revenues and/or state funds (subsidies and grants) (Argento et al, 2019) market revenues and/or grants and/ or donations (Billis, 2010;Ebrahim et al, 2014;Luke, 2016) private investment and/or market revenues and/or state funds (Engel et al, 2014;Zarco-Jasso, 2005) Source: Author's own elaboration outputs and outcomes (Vakkuri and Johanson, 2020, p. 13). NFR can serve as a means for these organizations to be cognizant of and transparent about multiple values they create by helping them to disclose information about their social and environmental performance.…”

Section: Non-financial Reportingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Non-financial reporting in hybrid organizations – a systematic literature review

Ahunov

2023

MEDAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to systematically review the field of non-financial reporting (NFR) in hybrid organizations, focusing on state-owned enterprises, third-sector organizations and public–private partnerships. This is a timely attempt to identify the state of the art in the literature and outline the future research agenda. The paper answers two research questions: RQ1. What can be learned about NFR in hybrid organizations from the existing literature? RQ2. What are the future avenues for research on the topic? Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review method was applied in this paper to summarize evidence from extant literature on NFR in hybrid organizations. The Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases were used to locate 92 articles for the review. Findings Recent years have witnessed a sharp increase in the number of articles on the topic. Regarding the implications of NFR for hybrid characteristics, NFR has some potential to strengthen the influence of non-market (i.e. state, community and social) logics in hybrid organizations. However, this potential may be limited due to the effect of market logics and the tensions that arise between the multiple logics in hybrid organizations. Regarding the implications of hybrid characteristics for NFR, these characteristics can not only affect the extent, the quality, the likelihood and the institutionalization of NFR but also result in the development of new NFR frameworks. The review calls for more research on the implications of NFR for multiple institutional logics and the implications of these logics for NFR in hybrid organizations. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first literature review that mobilizes insights from hybridity research to analyze NFR literature on diverse hybrid organizations.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Non-financial Reportingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-financial reporting in hybrid organizations – a systematic literature review

Ahunov

2023

MEDAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A good example of this concerns recent experiences with publicprivate partnerships (PPP's or P3's) 3 which are becoming a common tool to develop infrastructure as governments around the world have increasingly searched for new ways to finance projects, build infrastructure and deliver services (Daniels and Trebilcock, 1996;Grimsey and Lewis 2004). In addition to involving private enterprise, PPP's can help provide much needed capital to finance government programs and projects, thereby freeing public funds for other core economic, environmental and social programs (Trujillo et al 2003;Zarco-Jasso 2005). However their successful management also requires high levels of government expertise and oversight which may not always be forthcoming.…”

Section: The Infrastructure Canada Casementioning

confidence: 99%

Shifting Mandates and Climate Change Policy Capacity: The Canadian Infrastructure Case

Craft,

Howlett,

Crawford

2012

CPSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsive policy-making on climate change issues requires both sophisticated policy analysis as well as an institutional structure which allows problems to be dealt with on a multi-level and multi-sectoral basis. Designing such policies requires a high level of policy capability in relevant government departments and agencies matching changing organizational mandates in the area. This paper examines Infrastructure Canada’s evolving mandate over the past decade and assesses whether or not its resource allocation has matched any shifts in government expectations for the agency due arising from climate change challenges. Provincial data are also examined in a similar light.

show abstract

Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool

Glasbergen

2010

Env Pol Gov

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper studies the development of partnerships for sustainable development as a process in which actors from various sectors of society (state, market and civil) restructure and build new social relationships to create a more sustainable management practice. In the relevent literature we recognize three perspectives on this issue. From the fi rst, partnerships are studied as single collaborative arrangements. From the second perspective, attention is turned to the external effects of partnerships. Partnership arrangements are seen as tools for deliberate societal change. The third perspective takes a broader view on the governance system. Attention is focused on the changes that partnerships make in the confi guration of public decision-making structures. These perspectives will be connected in a Ladder of Partnership Activity, a conceptual device that allows us to better understand and analyse partnerships. The Ladder consists of fi ve core levels, set in a time frame. Each level is represented by a core activity. The Ladder is further encapsulated in three dimensions. Taking examples from recent empirical studies, the paper discusses each of the levels and their relationships. The fi nal section refl ects on the applicability of the Ladder concept and its strengths and weaknesses.

show abstract

Public private partnerships: a multidimensional model for contracting

Cited by 22 publications

References 51 publications

Non-financial reporting in hybrid organizations – a systematic literature review

Non-financial reporting in hybrid organizations – a systematic literature review

Shifting Mandates and Climate Change Policy Capacity: The Canadian Infrastructure Case

Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About