2005
DOI: 10.1080/14616710500055612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public–Private Partnership in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, in many Western countries, including Ireland, there has been a change in the nature of partnership from being a central-local government to being a public-private sector relationship (Couch, 1990;McGuirk & MacLaran, 2001;Boxmeer & Van Beckhoven, 2005). Policymakers, through various tax incentives, have sought to induce the private sector to invest in the inner city with the objective of freeing up public sector resources (Rhodes, 2009).…”
Section: Dependent Variable -Apartment Dissatisfactionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More specifically, in many Western countries, including Ireland, there has been a change in the nature of partnership from being a central-local government to being a public-private sector relationship (Couch, 1990;McGuirk & MacLaran, 2001;Boxmeer & Van Beckhoven, 2005). Policymakers, through various tax incentives, have sought to induce the private sector to invest in the inner city with the objective of freeing up public sector resources (Rhodes, 2009).…”
Section: Dependent Variable -Apartment Dissatisfactionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In local level more frequently PPPs are formed, in context of modern forms of urban governance and the decentralisation, a key characteristic of PPPs (Mohr, 2004;Kalogeropoulou, 2003). PPPs adopted especially in urban regeneration (Boxmeer and Beckhoven, 2005) in which context in 1950 private sector developers and local government were involved in joint ventures for downtown redevelopment, while the 1980s development corporations have worked with individual property developers on specific projects such as Battery Park City, the redevelopment of Times Square, Boston Housing Partnership, Cleveland Tomorrow, Rebuild LA, Dev Co New Jersey (Grimsey and Lewis, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Could that be that the closed system approach poses a harm to the overall PPP project success? Analysing PPPs in urban regeneration, Boxmeer and Beckhoven (2005) distinguished between so-called 'strong partnerships' with a power-balanced situation where decision rights, costs and risks are shared among the individual stakeholders, and 'weak partnerships' where all the important competences are concentrated -very often in the hands of a single actor. Strong open partnerships tend to prevail in countries with a long tradition of consociational democracies and consensual decision making.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%