Public–private Interaction in Contracting: Governance Strategies in the Competitive Dialogue of Dutch Infrastructure Projects

Abstract

The competitive dialogue (CD) procurement procedure aims to structure and facilitate public–private interaction in procurement. In this article we examine the CD procedures of four complex Dutch road infrastructure projects and explore how the mix in public–private interaction between the three governance strategies of cooperation, competition, and coordination is conditioned by various external influences. We found that public authorities' strict legal coordination can structure the CD process, but may divert attention from the required interaction on project‐specific complexities. Combined with private contractors' focus on competition, this does not stimulate public–private cooperation. We conclude that CD is a promising tool for facilitating public–private interaction, but, in practice, the optimal mix of governance strategies is not achieved. We recommend strengthening cooperation by encouraging public and private tender organizations to collaboratively search for opportunities to deal with complexity in planning.

Implementing Government Policy in Supply Chains: An International Coproduction Study of Public Procurement

“…Even where government targets for small business engagement in public contracts are set, achieving these targets is problematic (Kidalov & Snider, ), and there are straightforward reasons for this. First, despite private sector supply chain research showing the importance of longer term, more integrated relationships with suppliers (Cousins, Handfield, et al., ; Cousins, Lawson & Squire, ; Mentzer et al., ; Zhang et al., ), the strict legal and accountability frameworks within which public procurement has to operate can be constraining (Ya Ni & Bretschneider, ) and can impede public procurement practitioners’ abilities to collaborate with suppliers on complex details of specifications associated with larger infrastructure projects (Lenferink, Tillema & Arts, ). A more distant relationship with public procurement practitioners and their tendency to over‐specify contract requirements, rather than procure outcomes, also inhibits innovative suppliers’ abilities to secure public contracts (Uyarra, Edler, Garcia‐Estevez, Georghiou & Yeow, ).…”

A study of the operationalization of management controls in United Kingdom Private Finance Initiative contracts

“…Collaboration and trust-building is really important for the visibility of our collective risks ... and working jointly trying to resolve those. (Contract Manager-HA) Lenferink et al (2013) suggest that real partnership (defined in this research as 'trust practices') between PFI partners could have significant (positive) impacts on project outcomes. Such practices could involve adopting noncontractual strategies to manage the project within a complex environment (Steijn et al 2011).…”

Early contractor involvement approaches in public project procurement

“…(Ciribini et al, 2016), (Williams et al, 2013) Integrated Project Insurancean alternative form of insurance providing single cover for the construction project team as a whole. (Ciribini et al, 2016), (Connaughton and Weller, 2013) Opening for alternative tendersthe client, ( Lenferink et al, 2012), (Hoezen, 2012), (Kolman, 2014), (Lenferink et al, 2013), (Marique, 2013), (European Parliament, 2014) Best value procurement (BVP) -It is an award method to procure contractor with the best expertise to complete the task. (Hoezen, 2012), (Kashiwagi, 2016) Negotiated procedure -Procurement procedure like competitive dialogue but can be applied in simpler public projects.…”