Policy Analysis in the Czech Republic 2016
DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447318149.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public policy in the Czech Republic: historical development and its current state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…species is identified based on the undulation of its leaf blade, alongside gynostemium features. This property is quoted in nearly every artificial key for determining this group of orchids, e.g., Sundermann ( 1975 ), Procházka & Velísek ( 1983 ), Potůček & Čačko ( 1996 ) and Delforge ( 2006 ). However, it has been shown by Jakubska-Busse & Gola ( 2014 ) that the leaf undulation in Helleborines does not have any diagnostic value as a non-programmed intrinsic feature and should not be applied to taxa identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…species is identified based on the undulation of its leaf blade, alongside gynostemium features. This property is quoted in nearly every artificial key for determining this group of orchids, e.g., Sundermann ( 1975 ), Procházka & Velísek ( 1983 ), Potůček & Čačko ( 1996 ) and Delforge ( 2006 ). However, it has been shown by Jakubska-Busse & Gola ( 2014 ) that the leaf undulation in Helleborines does not have any diagnostic value as a non-programmed intrinsic feature and should not be applied to taxa identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is often the case that a policy is implemented but not fully followed through as intended, such that the intended results are not achieved (Potůček, 2018). As with policy responses, different stakeholders offer speci c objections to these paths as well as standards used to judge them ( Van et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main source of this variability, referred to the phenotypic plasticity, is manifested in natural populations of many Epipactis species through the slight differences observed in the vegetative (e.g., shoots and leaves) and generative (i.e., flowers and their separate elements) parts of the individual plants [ 4 , 15 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. This broad spectrum of morphological variation also provided a wide range of characters that delimitate and group the species within the genus Epipactis over the past few decades (e.g., [ 14 , 17 , 21 , 23 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]). As a consequence, a large number of morphologically similar species and infraspecific taxa (i.e., subspecies, varieties, or forms), usually of local or narrowly restricted occurrence, have been described within Epipactis [ 17 , 23 , 31 , 55 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%