Public perspectives and media reporting of wolf reintroduction in Colorado

Abstract

In the state of Colorado, a citizen ballot initiative to reintroduce gray wolves (Canis Lupus) is eliciting polarization and conflict among multiple stakeholder and interest groups. Given this complex social landscape, we examined the social context surrounding wolf reintroduction in Colorado as of 2019. We used an online survey of 734 Coloradans representative in terms of age and gender, and we sampled from different regions across the state, to examine public beliefs and attitudes related to wolf reintroduction and various wolf management options. We also conducted a content analysis of media coverage on potential wolf reintroduction in 10 major daily Colorado newspapers from January 2019, when the signature-gathering effort for the wolf reintroduction initiative began, through the end of January 2020, when the initiative was officially added to the ballot. Our findings suggest a high degree of social tolerance or desire for wolf reintroduction in Colorado across geographies, stakeholder groups, and demographics. However, we also find that a portion of the public believes that wolves would negatively impact their livelihoods, primarily because of concerns over the safety of people and pets, loss of hunting opportunities, and potential wolf predation on livestock. These concerns—particularly those related to livestock losses—are strongly reflected in the media. We find that media coverage has focused only on a few of the many perceived positive and negative impacts of wolf reintroduction identified among the public. Our findings highlight the need to account for this diversity of perspectives in future decisions and to conduct public outreach regarding likely impacts of wolf reintroduction.

Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States

“…These attitudes are heavily influenced by the background political climate and current events ( Carter, 2018 ). For instance, support for or opposition to wolf conservation is strongly influenced by multiple factors including political ideology, media coverage, media message framing, and beliefs regarding property rights and federal versus state power ( Bruskotter et al, 2011 , Casola et al, 2020 , Eeden et al, 2021 , Hamilton et al, 2020 , Niemiec et al, 2020 ).…”

Conservation lessons from taboos and trolley problems

“…Prioritizing media coverage (e.g., Niemiec et al. 2020) and careful use of language to manage a discourse (Serenari & Lute 2020) may be critical to continued success.…”

“…Avoiding regret-driven reversals suggests conservation organizations should prioritize reinforcing the benefits achieved through conservation action. Prioritizing media coverage (e.g., Niemiec et al 2020) and careful use of language to manage a discourse (Serenari & Lute 2020) may be critical to continued success.…”

Renewed coexistence: learning from steering group stakeholders on a beaver reintroduction project in England

“…For example, although proposals for grey wolf (Canis lupus) reintroduction are favoured amongst the public in the western USA, some groups hold more negative views, e.g. farming and ranching groups whose economic interests may be affected by predation (Houston et al 2010;Niemiec et al 2020a;Sponarski et al 2013;Williams et al 2002). A study of attitudes towards wolf management in Colorado (where reintroduction is proposed) also found split opinions on acceptable management measures (Niemiec et al 2020a).…”

“…farming and ranching groups whose economic interests may be affected by predation (Houston et al 2010;Niemiec et al 2020a;Sponarski et al 2013;Williams et al 2002). A study of attitudes towards wolf management in Colorado (where reintroduction is proposed) also found split opinions on acceptable management measures (Niemiec et al 2020a).…”