Public Perceptions Regarding Use of Virtual Reality in Health Care: A Social Media Content Analysis Using Facebook

Abstract

Background Virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive environment that enables users to have modified experiences of reality. VR is increasingly used to manage patients with pain, disability, obesity, neurologic dysfunction, anxiety, and depression. However, public opinion regarding the use of VR in health care has not been explored. Understanding public opinion of VR is critical to ensuring effective implementation of this emerging technology. Objective This study aimed to examine public opinion about health care VR using social listening, a method that allows for the exploration of unfiltered views of topics discussed on social media and online forums. Methods In March 2016, NBC News produced a video depicting the use of VR for patient care. The video was repackaged by NowThis, a social media news website, and distributed on Facebook by Upworthy, a news aggregator, yielding 4.3 million views and 2401 comments. We used Microsoft Excel Power Query and ATLAS.ti software (version 7.5, Scientific Software Development) to analyze the comments using content analysis and categorized the comments around first-, second-, and third-order concepts. We determined self-identified gender from the user’s Facebook page and performed sentiment analysis of the language to analyze whether the perception of VR differed by gender using a Pearson’s chi-square test. Results Out of the 1614 analyzable comments, 1021 (63.26%) were attributed to female Facebook users, 572 (35.44%) to male users, and 21 (1.30%) to users of unknown gender. There were 1197 comments coded as expressing a positive perception about VR (74.16%), 251 coded as expressing a negative perception and/or concern (15.56%), and 560 coded as neutral (34.70%). Informants identified 20 use cases for VR in health care, including the use of VR for pain and stress reduction; bed-bound individuals; women during labor; and patients undergoing chemotherapy, dialysis, radiation, or imaging procedures. Negative comments expressed concerns about radiation, infection risk, motion sickness, and the ubiquity of and overall dependence on technology. There was a statistically significant association between the language valence of the Facebook post and the gender of the Facebook user; men were more likely to post negative perceptions about the use of VR for health care, whereas women were more likely to post positive perceptions ( P <.001). Conclusions Most informants expressed positive perceptions about the use of VR in a wide range of health care settings. However, many expressed concerns that should be acknowledged and addressed as health care VR continues to evolve. Our results provide guidance in determining where further research on the use of VR in patient care is needed, and offer a formal opportunity for public opinion to shape the VR research agenda.

Current Practice in Low Vision Rehabilitation of Age-related Macular Degeneration and Usefulness of Virtual Reality as a Rehabilitation Tool

“…Our study found that a majority of orthoptists would be willing to incorporate virtual reality as a therapeutic tool for AMD patients if studies prove its effectiveness. This is in concordance with a 2017 survey by Keller et al that used social media posts (Facebook) to solicit public opinion on the use of VR in healthcare [77]. However, within the general population, Keller also found a positive correlation between a person's age and his skepticism of VR's utility.…”

Public perceptions on using Virtual Reality and Mobile Apps in Anxiety treatment

“…In line with past research, this study found positive public perceptions towards VR (Keller et al, 2017). However, overall, participants viewed VR as moderately illegitimate ( Figure 2a) and moderately effective (Figure 3), demonstrating a sense of uncertainty.…”

Perceptions of who is in the healthcare team? A content analysis of social media posts during COVID-19 pandemic

“…frequencies and percentages of themes and discrete emotions were calculated. Social listening techniques were conducted to capture public perceptions as this approach is able to gather unfiltered public perceptions and avoid the Hawthorne effect where participant may change their behaviour if they are aware they are being studied or may not participate (Keller et al, 2017;McCambridge et al, 2014).…”