2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public perceptions of ocean health and marine protection: Drivers of support for Oregon's marine reserves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was unexpected, as generally individuals living closer to a marine coastline would be expected to have a more negative perception of ocean health, potentially driven by a better understanding of ocean threats through their economic and cultural ties to ocean services (e.g., fishing and tourism), and regular contact with the marine environment. The reason for this result is unclear, but the relationship between proximity to the coast and threat perception or concern for ocean health differs around the world among different communities and places (Potts et al, 2016;Davison et al, 2021;Manson et al, 2021) and appears to be largely affected by specific characteristics of the local society and environment (Hamilton and Safford, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was unexpected, as generally individuals living closer to a marine coastline would be expected to have a more negative perception of ocean health, potentially driven by a better understanding of ocean threats through their economic and cultural ties to ocean services (e.g., fishing and tourism), and regular contact with the marine environment. The reason for this result is unclear, but the relationship between proximity to the coast and threat perception or concern for ocean health differs around the world among different communities and places (Potts et al, 2016;Davison et al, 2021;Manson et al, 2021) and appears to be largely affected by specific characteristics of the local society and environment (Hamilton and Safford, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This opposition causes confusion and conflict between stakeholders, slowing progress towards ocean protection targets (Ballantine 2014, Manson et al 2021. As economic benefits, food security and other ecosystem services are underpinned by the restoration and bolstering of ecological functions, failure to adequately protect marine biodiversity and important larval dispersal ranges through increased recruitment, as, for example, was found by Le Port et al (2017), Pelc et al (2009Pelc et al ( , 2010 and Harrison et al (2012).…”
Section: Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst Oregon coastal residents, there was a belief that commercial and recreational fishers could be harmed by MR implementation (Needham, Cramer & Perry, 2013;Lindberg & Williams, 2019). Opposition to MRs was highest among coastal residents who did not live in close proximity to a reserve (Needham, Cramer & Perry, 2013) and Oregon residents with more positive attitudes toward commercial fisheries (Manson et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst Oregon coastal residents, there was a belief that commercial and recreational fishers could be harmed by MR implementation (Needham, Cramer & Perry, 2013; Lindberg & Williams, 2019). Opposition to MRs was highest among coastal residents who did not live in close proximity to a reserve (Needham, Cramer & Perry, 2013) and Oregon residents with more positive attitudes toward commercial fisheries (Manson et al, 2021). However, the majority of all Oregon residents also believed that MRs were generally beneficial, providing a range of conservation and research benefits (Needham, Cramer & Perry, 2013; Needham, Cramer & Johnston, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%