2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
84
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this modeling approach, a system network is constructed that link various biophysical processes to environmental outcomes, and various decision scenarios can be explored to predict impact to the outcomes. Advantages of Bayesian networks include their conceptual simplicity, graphical support, friendly semantics, and possibility for interaction among different actors (Castelletti and Soncini-Sessa, 2007a;Henriksen et al, 2007). The development of a Bayesian network representation of the system under study, either offline or online, may help in structuring the thinking process, identifying causal relations, integrating different knowledge bases, and making assumptions and limitations of datasets and models more transparent (Henriksen et al, 2007;Olsson and Andersson, 2007).…”
Section: Communication Of Results Scenario Building and Participatomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this modeling approach, a system network is constructed that link various biophysical processes to environmental outcomes, and various decision scenarios can be explored to predict impact to the outcomes. Advantages of Bayesian networks include their conceptual simplicity, graphical support, friendly semantics, and possibility for interaction among different actors (Castelletti and Soncini-Sessa, 2007a;Henriksen et al, 2007). The development of a Bayesian network representation of the system under study, either offline or online, may help in structuring the thinking process, identifying causal relations, integrating different knowledge bases, and making assumptions and limitations of datasets and models more transparent (Henriksen et al, 2007;Olsson and Andersson, 2007).…”
Section: Communication Of Results Scenario Building and Participatomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of Bayesian networks include their conceptual simplicity, graphical support, friendly semantics, and possibility for interaction among different actors (Castelletti and Soncini-Sessa, 2007a;Henriksen et al, 2007). The development of a Bayesian network representation of the system under study, either offline or online, may help in structuring the thinking process, identifying causal relations, integrating different knowledge bases, and making assumptions and limitations of datasets and models more transparent (Henriksen et al, 2007;Olsson and Andersson, 2007). Nevertheless, setting up successful participatory monitoring activities requires not only strong buy-in from relevant stakeholders, the process itself is time-consuming and relies upon a high level of leadership and interpersonal skills (Henriksen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Communication Of Results Scenario Building and Participatomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have shown successful use of bayesian networks as a tool of public participatory modelling for management purpose [Henriksen et al 2007]. But the authors insist on the need to adequately train the stakeholders (regarding probability theory) which is deemed unnecessary with our method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through Baysian Network modelling for participatory processes (e.g. Henriksen et al 2006;Bromley 2005;.…”
Section: Prepare Strategy and Action Planmentioning
confidence: 99%