2017
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3051/2017/v28i1a1379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public participation in technological innovation: The case of the Tshulu stove development programme

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary data were collected using both direct observation and semi-structured questionnaires with structured and open-ended questions. Semistructured questions were employed because of the exploratory nature of the study and because they allow for greater flexibility in addressing unanticipated new information and obtaining more detailed information than quantitative research approaches (Pienaar et al, 2017;Makonese and Bradnum, 2006). Respondents were informed about the study and consented to participate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary data were collected using both direct observation and semi-structured questionnaires with structured and open-ended questions. Semistructured questions were employed because of the exploratory nature of the study and because they allow for greater flexibility in addressing unanticipated new information and obtaining more detailed information than quantitative research approaches (Pienaar et al, 2017;Makonese and Bradnum, 2006). Respondents were informed about the study and consented to participate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study adopted a participatory bottom-up approach to understand the context of use of the cooking devices including cooking practices and user behaviours. This approach can potentially lead to the development of socially and technologically appropriate solutions [29], which in turn lead to widespread adoption rates and long-term sustainable uses of the technologies [30]. The stove development project followed a user-centered design process combined with co-design workshops to include end-users as decision makers in appropriate phases of the development.…”
Section: Methodology Participatory Bottom-up Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-design method followed typical design processes that included problem identification and understanding of local context. This was followed by a precedent study of existing and in-use cookstoves, reference material analysis, design and local manufacturing of a suite of prototype cookstoves, field experimentation of the designed cookstove prototypes, and performance improvement of existing prototypes [29]. Co-design workshops were set up, while ensuring direct interactions with the end-users at every stage of the process.…”
Section: Methodology Participatory Bottom-up Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations