2013
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public opinions on tax and retail-based tobacco control strategies

Abstract: While the support level varied between smokers and non-smokers, price and retail-based tobacco control strategies were consistently supported by the public, providing useful information for jurisdictions examining emerging tobacco control strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous findings showing relatively lower support among smokers for several other tobacco control policies such as smoke-free laws and tobacco tax increases [5,12,13,14,15,16]. It is interesting to note that while pictorial warnings were more likely to have elicited a behavioral response among former and current smokers in comparison to text-only warning labels, no significant differences between the two were noted in the context of a cognitive-only response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is consistent with previous findings showing relatively lower support among smokers for several other tobacco control policies such as smoke-free laws and tobacco tax increases [5,12,13,14,15,16]. It is interesting to note that while pictorial warnings were more likely to have elicited a behavioral response among former and current smokers in comparison to text-only warning labels, no significant differences between the two were noted in the context of a cognitive-only response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Compared to young adults (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), older adults aged (45-54), (55-64), and (65+) were significantly less likely to express, an opinion "in favor" (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9), (AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9), (AOR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1-0.4) than to report, "don't know." Compared to the reference group, individuals who expressed either a supportive or opposing opinion did not significantly differ by gender, race/ethnicity, household income, education level, or U.S. census region ( Table 2).…”
Section: Multiple Multinomial Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,19 Given the rapid increase in e-cigarette use and the differing perspectives of whether e-cigarette use should be encouraged or discouraged, there is a pressing need to examine public attitudes about allowing the use of e-cigarettes in currently smoke-free areas. The objectives of the current study were to examine public opinion on whether e-cigarette use should be allowed in public areas where smoking is currently prohibited and to examine these opinions by socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status, e-cigarette awareness, and ever use of e-cigarettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic characteristics and health: Participants provided their age, sex, household income, and education level, and rated how strongly they agreed or disagreed with the following statement, "I care about living a healthy lifestyle" on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 5 (strongly agree). Race/ethnicity was measured because of variation in obesity prevalence across racial/ethnic groups, 28 which may affect support for obesity policies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Similarities between the food and tobacco industries have led public health advocates to point to successful anti-smoking policies as potential strategies for addressing obesity. [2][3][4][5] Restrictions on cigarette advertising and cigarette taxes are largely supported by the American public [6][7][8] and have contributed to a vast reduction in smoking prevalence. [9][10][11] By contrast, similar obesity-related policies, like taxation of sugary drinks, have less public support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%