Public Opinion on European Health Policy, Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Often, global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, bring to light crucial weaknesses in political, economic, social and health systems. First, there are governments who formulate and implement policies and, second, there are the citizens who support them, thus contributing a great deal to their success. Our paper investigates the European citizens’ opinion on health policy, focusing on their preference for European health policy during the coronavirus pandemic. The paper uses bibliometric analysis, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression to discuss the public opinion on health policy, the factors of influence, the change in perspectives between 2020 and 2021, and the socio-demographic profile of those favorable for the development of a European health policy in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Our findings show that citizens from southern and central European countries are more likely to prioritize the development of a European health policy, as compared to Nordic countries. Between 2020 and 2021, pro-European health policy citizens profile changes and becomes clearer, from pensioners to young working age males with medium education. In general, people prioritizing a European health policy value health as the most important issue at a national level are generally satisfied with the European Union and do not trust their national government.

A Methodological Framework for Developing a Smart-Tourism Destination in the Southeastern Adriatic–Ionian Area

“…In other words, technologies are transforming the static and practical aspects of the management of tourism and marketing into a dynamic process (in which managers and tourists use technology as a tool) that allows market players and actors (tourism providers, stakeholders, intermediaries, and tourists) in the tourism industry to shape technology and also be affected by it [24]. In fact, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, digital technologies have assumed a fundamental role as in many sectors [70][71][72][73], also in the strategies restarting tourism companies as well as for governments involved in the planning and execution of public policies for sustaining the competitiveness of tourism companies and destinations and managing the crisis, enabling a process of transformation able to reduce the negative impacts of the emergence by creating opportunities for future development [74].…”

Research Trends in Resilience and Vulnerability Studies

“…A literature review on COVID-19 in disaster/crisis literature suggested that resilience studies "discuss the necessity of developing dynamic capabilities in logistics and production capacity, recalibrating and reconfiguring operations, as well as the importance of emotions as an intrinsic element of resilience during pandemic governance" [38]. Vasilescu, Apostu, Militaru, and Hysa [39] noted that the COVID-19 response in certain respects showed low resilience, with opportunities available to improve responses for future events. Mental health, clarity of communication, and social responsibility are subtopics associated with community resilience [38].…”