2018
DOI: 10.1080/0098261x.2018.1438217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Public Opinion and Opposition Party Success: Evidence from the European Constitutional Courts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The debate on the role and importance of a constitutional complaint in improving the quality of legislation in international scientific circles has been going on for a long time, with many supporters and many critics (González-Ocantos, 2016). Bricker and Wondreys (2018) support the position that anyone can file a complaint against a normative act after its promulgation, without being obliged to prove that the relevant norm directly and currently affects his rights and freedoms. Lübbe-Wolff (2016) also defined the actio popularis as the main guarantee of comprehensive constitutional review, since anyone can apply to the Constitutional Court.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate on the role and importance of a constitutional complaint in improving the quality of legislation in international scientific circles has been going on for a long time, with many supporters and many critics (González-Ocantos, 2016). Bricker and Wondreys (2018) support the position that anyone can file a complaint against a normative act after its promulgation, without being obliged to prove that the relevant norm directly and currently affects his rights and freedoms. Lübbe-Wolff (2016) also defined the actio popularis as the main guarantee of comprehensive constitutional review, since anyone can apply to the Constitutional Court.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also suggests that lessons learned from the study of presidencies can be applied to other governmental institutions at all levels ( 29 ) and that the TLB theory ( 8 ) contributes to a broad understanding of presidents in their final terms ( 30 ). The concept of SD used here ( 12 ) has been studied globally, mostly in the context of judicial systems; for example, there is evidence of “high court judges in the European Constitutional Court overturning cases more often and agree with the parliament less when public approval is shifting toward the opposition and away from the parliamentary majority” ( 31 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…150 In Europe, evidence suggests that domestic public opinion indirectly influences European constitutional courts, including the FCC. 151 For instance, a study showed how the German Court's ESM ruling 'appeared to adhere closely to the contours of public opinion'. 152 The point can also be indirectly gleaned from the President of FCC's introductory remarks to the PSSP judgement where he was keen on allaying the public concern that the judgement does not 'make any statement' on ECB's COVID-19 programs.…”
Section: Comparative Insights and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%